I would like to discuss an important matter regarding the quality and cleanliness of our communication here.

Due to the rapid development of AI, we have found that traditional protection methods no longer work. Software like Xevil cracks any captcha with ease, and neural networks have learned to write frighteningly realistic spam and flood messages to bypass filters. Distinguishing a bot from a human is becoming increasingly difficult.

I spent a long time looking for a solution that would guarantee us adequate communication without digital junk. The conclusion was simple: the best anti-spam is a micro-subscription. No bot will pay even $1 to post an advertisement.

Therefore, we are transitioning to a new registration format — "Club Access." The forum is now open to two categories of participants:

1. Our Clients. If you have already made purchases in our online store, access is automatically open for you (or, upon purchasing a device, the subscription becomes lifetime).

2. Subscribers. The annual subscription costs only $7 (the price of two cups of coffee).

The cost of annual access is $7. In return, you receive a €50 discount on our device. Thus, the discount covers the registration costs many times over — the savings you receive are enough to cover the forum subscription for 7 years.

Welcome to a spam-free zone!

I have personally encountered this, and our clients also frequently report that working in bright sunlight causes issues with the tachometer. The photosensitive element gets "blinded" by the light, making it impossible to take readings.

We usually have to improvise to create shade using whatever is at hand. Sometimes you have to ask a colleague to block the sun with a shovel, other times you end up taping cardboard directly to the equipment. It’s inconvenient and takes up quite a bit of time.

Recently, my colleague decided to solve this issue properly and designed a specific 3D-printed hood for the tachometer. It acts like a visor, cutting off excess light and protecting the sensor. We printed a few and tested them — the problem is gone.

I decided to share the download links for the models here (there are two versions). If you have access to a 3D printer, feel free to use them.

Download links:

I purchased your Vibromera (Balanset) balancing device and I have a few questions.

In Run 1, I installed a 420g test weight on side x1. For Run 2, I removed the test weight from x1 and moved it to x2 on the same rotor axis. Then I performed Run 2. After that, I welded the correction weights according to the calculated data (477g at 30° for plane 1 and 274g at 200° for plane 2).

When I performed the final Run Trim, the imbalance actually got worse than it was initially. The initial vibration was Vo1=7.46 mm/s and Vo2=6.79 mm/s, but after installing the correction weights, it increased to Vo1=13.8 mm/s and Vo2=18.0 mm/s.

What could be the reason for this?

I’m happy to welcome you to our brand-new forum! It has just been launched, so it may still seem a bit empty, but I assure you that this is only the beginning.

I will be here regularly to answer all your questions and keep the discussions active. This forum is a place for open conversations, knowledge sharing, and finding solutions together.

Feel free to ask questions, share your experiences, and suggest topics for discussion. Let’s build a helpful and engaging community together!

Join the discussions and be a part of our growing community!

Best regards,
Nikolai Shelkovenko