Document-controlled grounding test comparison
Documented Ground-Resistance Measurement Comparator
Compare a measured grounding-system resistance or impedance magnitude with a documented project limit for the same test configuration. No universal 1/5/25Ω safety threshold is supplied.
Documented test comparison
Implemented comparison—not an electrode design
ratio=x/L
x≤L → at or below entered limit; x>L → above entered limit
1Ω=1000mΩ exactly. This is general arithmetic,not an IEEE grounding formula or safety criterion.
NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCE: the former single-rod formula was labelled IEEE80 and the multi-rod result used undocumented efficiencies0.58/0.42/0.33. Exact geometry/end-effect assumptions and a validated multi-electrode model require the governing licensed standard or engineering method. They were removed rather than guessed.
Measurement and safety standards
Official IEEE record: IEEE81-2025. Licensed access is required for detailed procedures and equations.
Why 25Ω is not a universal target
Public NFPA NEC development material states that a single rod,pipe or plate electrode is supplemented unless its resistance to earth is25Ω or less;it also specifies minimum spacing for multiple electrodes and notes that larger spacing improves efficiency. That conditional installation rule is not a universal declaration that25Ω is safe for every facility,system or jurisdiction. The former “<5Ω good / <25Ω acceptable / >25Ω too high” output was removed.
Removed assumptions
The former page assumed homogeneous soil,used generic soil-type ranges as design inputs,substituted spacing=2L when blank,ignored conductor/contact resistance and seasonal/layered soil,and replaced an interaction sum with an unrelated efficiency map. It did not evaluate fault current,clearing time,touch/step potentials or measured uncertainty. Use site measurements and the approved design/test procedure.