What are Rotor Bar Defects? Broken Bars in Motors • Portable balancer, vibration analyzer "Balanset" for dynamic balancing crushers, fans, mulchers, augers on combines, shafts, centrifuges, turbines, and many others rotors What are Rotor Bar Defects? Broken Bars in Motors • Portable balancer, vibration analyzer "Balanset" for dynamic balancing crushers, fans, mulchers, augers on combines, shafts, centrifuges, turbines, and many others rotors

Understanding Rotor Bar Defects

Portable balancer & Vibration analyzer Balanset-1A

Vibration sensor

Optical Sensor (Laser Tachometer)

Balanset-4

Dynamic balancer “Balanset-1A” OEM

Definition: What are Rotor Bar Defects?

Rotor bar defects (also called broken rotor bars or cracked rotor bars) are fractures, cracks, or high-resistance connections in the conductor bars of squirrel cage induction motor rotors. Squirrel cage rotors consist of aluminum or copper bars embedded in iron core slots, with both ends of the bars connected by shorting rings (end rings). When bars break or end ring connections crack, electrical current cannot flow properly through the damaged bars, creating electromagnetic asymmetry, pulsating torque, and characteristic vibration and current signatures with sidebands at slip frequency spacing.

Rotor bar defects account for 10-15% of motor failures and are particularly problematic because they can progress from a single broken bar to multiple failures, creating severe vibration, torque pulsation, and eventual motor failure if not detected and corrected.

Types of Rotor Bar Defects

1. Broken Rotor Bars

  • Description: Complete fracture of conductor bar
  • Location: Typically near end rings where thermal and mechanical stress concentrated
  • Progression: Usually starts with crack, progresses to complete break
  • Multiple Bars: One broken bar increases stress on adjacent bars, leading to progressive failures

2. Cracked End Rings

  • Description: Fractures in shorting rings that connect rotor bars
  • Effect: Similar to broken bars—disrupts current flow
  • Location: Often at bar-to-ring junction
  • More Common In: Large motors, motors with frequent starts, high-inertia loads

3. High-Resistance Joints

  • Description: Poor electrical connection between bars and end rings
  • Cause: Manufacturing defects, thermal cycling, corrosion
  • Effect: Similar symptoms to broken bars but may be intermittent
  • Detection: More subtle signatures than complete breaks

4. Rotor Porosity

  • Voids in cast aluminum rotors
  • Reduces effective conductor cross-section
  • Can progress to cracks and breaks
  • Manufacturing defect but may not manifest until later in life

Causes of Rotor Bar Failures

Thermal Stresses

  • Thermal Cycling: Expansion/contraction from startup/shutdown
  • Differential Expansion: Aluminum bars expand more than iron core
  • Hot Spots: Localized overheating from high resistance
  • Frequent Starts: Each start creates thermal shock

Mechanical Stresses

  • Centrifugal Forces: Particularly in high-speed motors
  • Electromagnetic Forces: Pulsating forces during operation
  • Starting Torque: High currents during startup create mechanical stress
  • Vibration: External vibration fatiguing bars

Manufacturing Defects

  • Porosity in cast rotors
  • Poor bar-to-end ring bonding
  • Material inclusions or voids
  • Inadequate heat treatment

Operating Conditions

  • Frequent Starting: Thermal and electromagnetic stress
  • High Inertia Loads: Long acceleration times increase bar stress
  • Locked Rotor Events: Extreme currents and forces
  • Single-Phasing: Operating with one phase lost creates asymmetric currents

Vibration Signature

Characteristic Pattern

The hallmark of rotor bar defects is sidebands around running speed:

  • Central Peak: 1× running speed (fr)
  • Sidebands: fr ± fs, fr ± 2fs, fr ± 3fs
  • Where fs = slip frequency (typically 1-3 Hz)
  • Pattern: Symmetrical sidebands spaced at slip frequency intervals

Calculation of Slip Frequency

  • fs = (Nsync – Nactual) / 60
  • Example: 4-pole, 60 Hz motor
  • Nsync = 1800 RPM, Nactual = 1750 RPM
  • fs = (1800 – 1750) / 60 = 0.833 Hz
  • Sidebands appear at 29.17 ± 0.833 Hz (28.3 Hz and 30.0 Hz)

Load Dependence

  • No Load: Minimal sidebands (low slip, low current through broken bars)
  • Light Load: Small sidebands beginning to appear
  • Full Load: Strong sidebands, most obvious diagnosis
  • Diagnostic Strategy: Test under load for best sensitivity

Current Signature (MCSA)

Motor current analysis shows same pattern as vibration:

  • Sidebands around line frequency (not running speed)
  • Pattern: fline ± 2fs (twice slip frequency in current)
  • For 60 Hz motor with 1 Hz slip: sidebands at 58 Hz and 62 Hz
  • Amplitude increases with number of broken bars
  • Can detect earlier than vibration in some cases

Detection and Diagnosis

Vibration Analysis Procedure

  1. Calculate Expected Pattern: Determine synchronous speed, measure actual speed, calculate slip frequency
  2. High-Resolution FFT: Use fine resolution (< 0.2 Hz) to resolve sidebands
  3. Look for Sidebands: Search for peaks at 1× ± slip frequency
  4. Under Load: Test with motor under normal operating load
  5. Confirm Pattern: Verify symmetric sidebands at correct spacing

Severity Assessment

  • Sideband < 40% of 1× peak: Possible single broken bar, monitor
  • 40-60% of 1×: Confirmed broken bar(s), plan replacement
  • > 60% of 1×: Multiple broken bars, urgent replacement needed
  • Sidebands > 1× peak: Severe condition, immediate action required

Consequences and Progression

Initial Failure (Single Bar)

  • Slight torque pulsation
  • Small sidebands appearing
  • May run for months with single broken bar
  • Performance degradation minimal

Progressive Failures (Multiple Bars)

  • Adjacent bars overheat from increased current
  • Thermal stress causes additional failures
  • Torque pulsations increase
  • Vibration becomes severe
  • Can progress from single to multiple bars in weeks

Severe Condition

  • Multiple adjacent broken bars
  • Severe torque pulsation
  • High vibration and noise
  • Overheating of rotor
  • Risk of complete rotor failure
  • May damage stator from excessive current

Corrective Actions

Upon Detection

  • Increase monitoring frequency (monthly → weekly)
  • Perform MCSA to confirm diagnosis
  • Plan motor replacement or rotor replacement
  • Prepare spare motor if critical application
  • Consider root cause (why bars broke)

Repair Options

  • Rotor Replacement: Most reliable solution for large motors
  • Complete Motor Replacement: Often most economical for small motors
  • Rotor Recasting: Specialized shops can recast aluminum rotors
  • Temporary Operation: Single broken bar may allow continued operation with monitoring

Prevention

  • Minimize frequent starts (use soft starters or VFDs)
  • Avoid single-phasing conditions
  • Ensure adequate ventilation and cooling
  • Use motors rated for duty cycle (frequent start motors for high-cycle applications)
  • Monitor for early detection before multiple failures

Rotor bar defects are among the most diagnostically distinctive motor faults, with their characteristic slip frequency sidebands enabling reliable detection through both vibration and current analysis. Early identification allows planned motor replacement before progression to multiple bar failures that can cause catastrophic rotor damage and extended unplanned downtime.


← Back to Main Index

WhatsApp