Understanding Warning Levels

Devices

Portable balancer & Vibration analyzer Balanset-1A

$2,336.95 Izvorna cijena bila je: $2,336.95.$2,011.55Trenutna cijena je: $2,011.55.

Parts

Vibration sensor

$106.49 Izvorna cijena bila je: $106.49.$82.83Trenutna cijena je: $82.83.

Parts

Optical Sensor (Laser Tachometer)

$146.72 Izvorna cijena bila je: $146.72.$106.49Trenutna cijena je: $106.49.

Devices

Balanset-4

$8,049.74

Parts

Magnetic Stand Insize-60-kgf

$54.43

Parts

Reflective tape

$11.83

Devices

Dynamic balancer “Balanset-1A” OEM

$2,052.96 Izvorna cijena bila je: $2,052.96.$1,774.90Trenutna cijena je: $1,774.90.

Definition: What is a Warning Level?

Warning level is an intermediate alarm threshold in multi-level vibration monitoring systems, positioned between initial alert and critical danger levels. When vibration exceeds the warning level, it indicates a confirmed problem requiring planned maintenance action, typically within 1-4 weeks. The warning level is analogous to ISO 20816 Zone C boundary—unsatisfactory for continuous operation, requiring corrective action, but not immediately critical.

Warning levels serve as the primary action trigger in predictive maintenance programs, signaling that the window of opportunity for planned intervention is open: the fault is confirmed and progressing, but sufficient time remains for orderly maintenance scheduling, parts procurement, and execution during planned downtime.

Position in Alarm Hierarchy

Multi-Tier System

1. Normal: Below all thresholds, healthy operation
2. Alert/Caution: First threshold, possible problem, investigate
3. Warning: Confirmed problem, plan maintenance (this level)
4. Danger/Critical: Severe condition, urgent action
5. Trip/Shutdown: Emergency stop required

Typical Values

• Baseline-Referenced: Warning = 4× baseline vibration
• Standards-Based: Warning = ISO 20816 Zone C/D boundary
• Absolute: Warning = 7-11 mm/s velocity for general machinery
• Equipment-Specific: Varies by machine type, size, speed

Warning Level Significance

Confirmed Problem

• Not a transient or measurement error
• Fault confirmed through trending
• Requires corrective action
• Simply continuing to monitor insufficient

Planning Window

• Time available for orderly response
• Not emergency but not indefinite
• Typical window: 1-4 weeks to repair
• Allows maintenance scheduling, parts ordering

Economic Optimization

• Early enough to prevent secondary damage
• Late enough to have used equipment capacity
• Balance between premature intervention and failure risk
• Optimal maintenance timing

Setting Warning Levels

Factors to Consider

Equipment Criticality

• Critical: Lower (tighter) warning levels for earlier intervention
• Non-Critical: Higher (looser) levels acceptable
• Safety Impact: Lower levels if safety consequences

Failure Mode Speed

• Slow Deterioration: Higher warning level acceptable (weeks available)
• Rapid Progression: Lower warning level needed (days available)
• Based On: Historical failure data for equipment type

Maintenance Scheduling

• Must allow time to plan and schedule outage
• Consider typical procurement lead times
• Account for production scheduling constraints
• Warning level should trigger with adequate planning time

Response to Warning Level Exceedance

Immediate Actions

1. Confirm Alarm: Verify not false alarm or measurement error
2. Detailed Analysis: Spectral analysis to identify specific fault
3. Severity Assessment: How fast is vibration increasing?
4. Generate Work Order: Initiate maintenance planning
5. Increase Monitoring: Weekly or daily measurements

Planning Actions

• Determine required repairs/parts
• Procurement of spare parts
• Schedule outage window
• Assign resources (personnel, tools)
• Prepare work instructions

Execution Timeline

• Non-Critical Equipment: Next convenient outage (2-4 weeks)
• Important Equipment: Plan dedicated outage (1-2 weeks)
• Critical Equipment: Expedite scheduling (days to week)
• Adjust: Based on vibration progression rate

Documentation

Alarm Level Records

• Document all alarm setpoints for each machine
• Rationale for chosen levels
• Date established and any changes
• Approval and review process

Alarm Event Logs

• When warning level exceeded
• Vibration value and trend
• Investigation findings
• Actions taken
• Resolution and results

Optimization

False Alarm Tracking

• Count alarms that didn’t result in found defects
• Target: < 10% false alarm rate
• If higher: warning levels may be too tight
• Adjust upward if excessive false alarms

Missed Failure Analysis

• If failure occurred before warning level reached
• Warning level too lenient
• Lower thresholds to catch earlier
• Or increase monitoring frequency

Continuous Refinement

• Review annually or after significant events
• Incorporate operational experience
• Update based on equipment modifications
• Maintain documentation of changes

Warning levels are the action thresholds in condition monitoring programs that trigger planned maintenance interventions. Properly set between initial alerts and critical conditions, warning levels provide the optimal intervention point where problems are confirmed but time remains for orderly response, enabling the planned, cost-effective maintenance that is the promise of predictive maintenance strategies.

---

← Back to Main Index