Understanding Multi-Plane Balancing

Devices

Portable balancer & Vibration analyzer Balanset-1A

$2,353.83

Parts

Vibration sensor

$107.26

Parts

Optical Sensor (Laser Tachometer)

$147.78

Devices

Balanset-4

$8,107.90

Parts

Magnetic Stand Insize-60-kgf

$54.82

Parts

Reflective tape

$11.92

Devices

Dynamic balancer “Balanset-1A” OEM

$2,067.80

Definition: What is Multi-Plane Balancing?

Multi-plane balancing is an advanced balancing procedure that uses three or more correction planes distributed along the length of a rotor to achieve acceptable vibration levels. This technique is necessary for flexible rotors—rotors that bend or flex significantly during operation because they run at speeds above one or more critical speeds.

While two-plane balancing is sufficient for most rigid rotors, multi-plane balancing extends the principle to accommodate the complex deflection shapes (mode shapes) that flexible rotors exhibit at high speeds.

When is Multi-Plane Balancing Required?

Multi-plane balancing becomes necessary in several specific situations:

1. Flexible Rotors Operating Above Critical Speeds

The most common application is for flexible rotors—long, slender rotors that operate at speeds higher than their first (and sometimes second or third) critical speed. Examples include:

• Steam and gas turbine rotors
• High-speed compressor shafts
• Paper machine rolls
• Large generator rotors
• Centrifuge rotors
• High-speed spindles

These rotors undergo significant bending during operation, and their deflection shape changes depending on rotational speed and which mode is excited. Two correction planes are simply insufficient to control vibration across all operating speeds.

2. Very Long Rigid Rotors

Even some rigid rotors, if extremely long relative to their diameter, may benefit from three or more correction planes to minimize vibration at multiple bearing locations along the shaft.

3. Rotors with Complex Mass Distribution

Rotors with multiple discs, wheels, or impellers at various axial locations may require individual balancing of each element, resulting in a multi-plane balancing procedure.

4. When Two-Plane Balancing Proves Inadequate

If a two-plane balancing attempt reduces vibration at the measured bearing locations but vibration remains high at intermediate locations along the rotor (such as mid-span deflection), additional correction planes may be needed.

The Challenge: Flexible Rotor Dynamics

Flexible rotors present unique challenges that make multi-plane balancing complex:

Mode Shapes

When a flexible rotor passes through a critical speed, it vibrates in a specific pattern called a mode shape. The first mode typically shows the shaft bending in a single smooth arc, the second mode shows an S-curve with a node point in the middle, and higher modes show increasingly complex shapes. Each mode requires specific correction weight distribution.

Speed-Dependent Behavior

The unbalance response of a flexible rotor changes dramatically with speed. A correction that works well at one speed may be ineffective or even counterproductive at another speed. Multi-plane balancing must account for the entire operating speed range.

Cross-Coupling Effects

In multi-plane balancing, a correction weight in any one plane influences vibration at all measurement locations. With three, four, or more correction planes, the mathematical relationships become significantly more complex than in two-plane balancing.

The Multi-Plane Balancing Procedure

The procedure extends the influence coefficient method used in two-plane balancing:

Step 1: Initial Measurements

Measure vibration at multiple locations along the rotor (typically at each bearing, and sometimes at intermediate locations) at the operating speed of interest. For flexible rotors, measurements may need to be taken at multiple speeds.

Step 2: Define Correction Planes

Identify N correction planes where weights can be added. These should be distributed along the rotor’s length at accessible locations such as coupling flanges, wheel rims, or specially designed balance rings.

Step 3: Sequential Trial Weight Runs

Perform N trial runs, each with a trial weight in one correction plane. For example, with four correction planes:

• Run 1: Trial weight in Plane 1 only
• Run 2: Trial weight in Plane 2 only
• Run 3: Trial weight in Plane 3 only
• Run 4: Trial weight in Plane 4 only

During each run, measure vibration at all sensor locations. This builds a complete influence coefficient matrix describing how each correction plane affects each measurement point.

Step 4: Calculate Correction Weights

The balancing software solves a system of N simultaneous equations (where N is the number of correction planes) to calculate the optimal correction weights for each plane. This calculation uses matrix algebra and is far too complex to perform manually—specialized software is essential.

Step 5: Install and Verify

Install all calculated correction weights simultaneously and verify vibration levels. For flexible rotors, verification should be performed across the full operating speed range to ensure acceptable vibration at all speeds.

Modal Balancing: An Alternative Approach

For highly flexible rotors, an advanced technique called modal balancing can be more effective than conventional multi-plane balancing. Modal balancing targets specific vibration modes rather than specific speeds. By calculating correction weights that match the rotor’s natural mode shapes, it can achieve better results with fewer trial runs. However, this method requires sophisticated analysis tools and a deep understanding of rotor dynamics.

Complexity and Practical Considerations

Multi-plane balancing is significantly more complex than two-plane balancing:

Number of Trial Runs

The number of required trial runs increases linearly with the number of planes. A four-plane balance requires four trial runs plus the initial and verification runs—a total of six starts and stops. This increases cost, time, and wear on the machine.

Mathematical Complexity

Solving for N correction weights requires inverting an N×N matrix, which is computationally intensive and can be numerically unstable if measurements are noisy or if the correction planes are poorly positioned.

Measurement Accuracy

Because multi-plane balancing relies on solving many simultaneous equations, measurement errors and noise have a larger impact than in two-plane balancing. High-quality sensors and careful data collection are essential.

Correction Plane Accessibility

Finding N accessible and effective correction plane locations can be challenging, especially on machines that were not originally designed for multi-plane balancing.

Equipment and Software Requirements

Multi-plane balancing requires:

• Advanced Balancing Software: Capable of handling N×N influence coefficient matrices and solving systems of complex vector equations.
• Multiple Vibration Sensors: At least N sensors (one per measurement location) are recommended, though some instruments can work with fewer sensors by repositioning them between runs.
• Tachometer/Keyphasor: Essential for accurate phase measurement.
• Experienced Personnel: The complexity of multi-plane balancing demands technicians with advanced training in rotor dynamics and vibration analysis.

Typical Applications

Multi-plane balancing is standard practice in industries with high-speed machinery:

• Power Generation: Large steam and gas turbine-generator sets
• Petrochemical: High-speed centrifugal compressors and turboexpanders
• Pulp and Paper: Long paper machine dryer rolls and calendar rolls
• Aerospace: Aircraft engine rotors and turbomachinery
• Manufacturing: High-speed machine tool spindles

In these applications, the investment in multi-plane balancing is justified by the criticality of the equipment, the consequences of failure, and the operational efficiency gains from running with minimal vibration.

---

← Back to Main Index