Understanding Remaining Useful Life (RUL)

Devices

Portable balancer & Vibration analyzer Balanset-1A

$2,347.12 Izvorna cijena bila je: $2,347.12.$1,901.46Trenutna cijena je: $1,901.46.

Parts

Vibration sensor

$106.96 Izvorna cijena bila je: $106.96.$71.30Trenutna cijena je: $71.30.

Parts

Optical Sensor (Laser Tachometer)

$147.36 Izvorna cijena bila je: $147.36.$83.19Trenutna cijena je: $83.19.

Devices

Balanset-4

$8,084.78

Parts

Magnetic Stand Insize-60-kgf

$54.67

Parts

Reflective tape

$11.88

Devices

Dynamic balancer “Balanset-1A” OEM

$2,061.90 Izvorna cijena bila je: $2,061.90.$1,663.78Trenutna cijena je: $1,663.78.

Definition: What is Remaining Useful Life?

Remaining useful life (RUL) is an estimate of the time period an equipment component or system can continue operating before reaching a defined failure threshold or requiring maintenance intervention. RUL is calculated from current condition indicators (vibration levels, trend progression rates, fault type characteristics) and represents the output of prognostic analysis. It is typically expressed in operating hours, calendar days, or cycles until intervention is required.

RUL estimation is the ultimate goal of predictive maintenance programs—transforming condition monitoring data into forward-looking actionable intelligence that enables optimal maintenance timing, maximizes equipment utilization, and minimizes both premature interventions and late failures.

RUL Calculation Approaches

Trend-Based RUL

Most common method:

1. Plot parameter (vibration amplitude) vs. time
2. Fit trend line to data
3. Define failure threshold (alarm limit, trip level)
4. Extrapolate trend to threshold crossing
5. Time to crossing = RUL

• Example: Bearing envelope vibration = 5g, increasing 1g/month, alarm at 10g → RUL = 5 months

Model-Based RUL

• Physics-based degradation models
• Example: Crack growth models, bearing fatigue life equations
• Requires detailed knowledge of stress, cycles, material properties
• More accurate but more complex

Data-Driven RUL

• Machine learning from historical failure data
• Pattern matching to previous similar progressions
• Statistical survival analysis
• Requires large dataset of run-to-failure cases

Hybrid Methods

• Combine trend extrapolation with expert judgment
• Adjust statistical predictions based on equipment knowledge
• Most practical for industrial applications

RUL Expression and Uncertainty

Time Basis

• Calendar Time: Days, weeks, months (most common)
• Operating Hours: Accounts for intermittent operation
• Cycles or Starts: For cyclic machinery
• Production Units: Tons processed, parts made

Confidence and Uncertainty

• RUL inherently uncertain (predictions, not facts)
• Express with confidence intervals: “30-90 days, 90% confidence”
• Or probability distributions
• Uncertainty decreases as failure approaches (more data, clearer trend)

Ranges vs. Point Estimates

• Point Estimate: “45 days RUL” (misleadingly precise)
• Range: “30-60 days RUL” (more honest)
• Best Practice: Provide range acknowledging uncertainty

Using RUL for Decision-Making

Maintenance Timing

• Schedule when RUL indicates optimal window
• Account for procurement lead times
• Coordinate with production schedules
• Plan before RUL expires (safety margin)

Safety Margins

• Non-Critical: Plan at 50-75% of predicted RUL
• Important: Plan at 25-50% of RUL
• Critical: Plan at 10-25% of RUL (conservative)
• Rationale: Account for prediction uncertainty, avoid failures

Resource Planning

• Parts ordering based on RUL
• Labor scheduling aligned with predicted needs
• Outage duration planning
• Contractor engagement for long lead items

Updating RUL Estimates

Continuous Revision

• Recalculate RUL with each new measurement
• Update trend fits with additional data
• Adjust if progression rate changes
• Most recent estimate most accurate

Progression Monitoring

• Linear Progression: RUL relatively stable, decreasing steadily
• Accelerating: RUL shrinking faster than calendar time (fault accelerating)
• Stable: RUL not decreasing (fault stable, may increase monitoring to confirm)

RUL by Fault Type

Bearing Defects

• Typical RUL: 3-12 months from envelope detection
• Exponential progression common (RUL shrinks rapidly as failure approaches)
• Good predictability with envelope trending

Unbalance

• Often stable (not progressing)
• RUL indefinite if vibration not excessive
• Schedule based on severity, not urgent timeline

Cracks

• Can progress rapidly once detected
• RUL: weeks to months typical
• High uncertainty (crack growth nonlinear)
• Conservative approach warranted

Documentation

RUL Reports

• Current RUL estimate and confidence
• Trending data supporting estimate
• Method used for calculation
• Assumptions and uncertainties
• Recommended intervention timing

Tracking and Updates

• Maintain RUL history for each defect
• Track estimate vs. actual outcomes
• Learn and improve prognostic models
• Document when RUL estimates were accurate or inaccurate

Integration with Maintenance Systems

CMMS Integration

• RUL feeds into maintenance scheduling
• Automatic work order generation based on RUL
• Parts ordering triggered by RUL thresholds
• Resource planning aligned with RUL forecasts

Production Scheduling

• Production aware of predicted outage needs
• Coordinate maintenance with production low-demand periods
• Balance production goals with reliability needs

Remaining useful life estimation is the prognostic capability that enables truly optimized predictive maintenance. By forecasting when intervention will be required based on condition trends, RUL allows maintenance scheduling that balances equipment utilization, failure risk, and maintenance costs—maximizing the value extracted from both equipment assets and maintenance resources.

---

← Back to Main Index