Documented Shaft-Alignment Criterion Comparison
Normalize one signed planar shaft-offset and angularity measurement, compare their magnitudes with externally approved values and derive the small-geometry quantities transparently.
Controlled planar measurement record
Use values from one declared vertical or horizontal plane, one declared reference plane and one machine state. Signed measurements are allowed; comparison values must be positive.
Documented arithmetic comparison
Equations, source boundaries and removed defects
These are unit conversions, plane-geometry relationships and arithmetic comparisons. They are not presented as an ISO, ANSI/ASA or API tolerance-selection formula. The signed value preserves the recorded direction; the comparison uses magnitude.
Why the former speed/coupling lookup was removed
The previous page selected one five-band table from RPM alone, then applied ×1.0, ×0.75 or ×0.5 according to “flexible”, “high-performance” or “rigid” coupling. No controlled source established those values or factors. It also used a spacer length as a generic gap dimension, although the correct tolerance format and geometry depend on the measurement method and coupling arrangement.
The official Prüftechnik on-board help states that, even for the same tolerance type, RPM and coupling diameter, values differ with coupling format; it also says there are no tolerance tables for consolidated spacer-shaft formats. That directly contradicts a universal RPM table plus coupling multiplier.
Official lifecycle and public scope inspected
| Šaltinis | Public status and scope used |
|---|---|
| ANSI/ASA S2.75-2017/Part 1 | The official ASA catalogue lists “Shaft Alignment Methodology, Part 1: General Principles, Methods, Practices, and Tolerances” as reaffirmed in 2025. The licensed grade equations/tables and application details are not reproduced here. |
| ISO 14691:2008 | Published edition 2, confirmed in 2024. It covers specified general-purpose petroleum/petrochemical/gas flexible couplings, typically stiff-shaft applications not exceeding 4000 r/min; it excludes rigid and several special coupling types and does not define coupling-type selection criteria. |
| ISO 10441:2007 | Published edition 2 and under systematic review in 2026. It covers specified special-purpose couplings for large/high-speed/critical services, excludes rigid and several other types, and does not define coupling-type selection criteria. |
| Prüftechnik Shaft Alignment on-board help, Version 2.0, p.56 | Official manufacturer manual visually inspected. It documents the coupling-format dependency and spacer-format limitation described above; it is not treated as a universal machine acceptance standard. |
| NIST Guide to the SI, Appendix B.8 | Exact length conversions: 1 in=0.0254 m and 1 mil (0.001 in)=0.0254 mm. |
Accessed: 15 July 2026. Licensed-source boundary: NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCE for ANSI/ASA alignment-grade formulas/tables, any exact API/ISO clause or value, and any OEM/site acceptance target. This page therefore requires externally approved values instead of guessing them.
Exact numerical checks
| Įėjimai | Expected normalized result |
|---|---|
| o=−0.05 mm; Olim=0.08 mm; a=0.10 mm/100 mm; Alim=0.12 mm/100 mm; L=150 mm | offset utilization=0.625; headroom=0.03 mm; slope=0.001; θ=0.999999666666867 mrad; angular utilization=5/6; Δ=0.15 mm |
| o=−1.96850393700787 mil; Olim=3.1496062992126 mil; a=1 mil/in; Alim=1.2 mil/in; L=5.90551181102362 in | same physical quantities and comparison relations, within numerical tolerance |
| o=0 and a=0 with positive controlled limits | valid zero measurements; zero utilization and full entered headroom |