Understanding Balancing Grade Classifications

Devices

Portable balancer & Vibration analyzer Balanset-1A

$2,353.83

Parts

Vibration sensor

$107.26

Parts

Optical Sensor (Laser Tachometer)

$147.78

Devices

Balanset-4

$8,107.90

Parts

Magnetic Stand Insize-60-kgf

$54.82

Parts

Reflective tape

$11.92

Devices

Dynamic balancer “Balanset-1A” OEM

$2,067.80

Definition: What is a Balancing Grade?

A balancing grade (also called balance quality grade or G-grade) is a standardized classification system that specifies the required balance quality for different types of rotating machinery. Defined primarily by the ISO 21940-11 standard (formerly ISO 1940-1), balancing grades categorize equipment based on their operational characteristics and assign appropriate balancing tolerances.

The grade system ensures that all parties—manufacturers, maintenance technicians, and end users—work to consistent, internationally recognized standards when specifying and verifying rotor balance quality.

The G-Grade System

Balancing grades are designated as “G” followed by a numerical value, such as G 2.5, G 6.3, or G 16. The number represents the product of the permissible residual unbalance eccentricity (in millimeters) and the angular velocity (in radians per second). In simpler terms, it represents the permissible unbalance vibration velocity in mm/s.

Key Principle

Lower G-numbers indicate tighter balance requirements (less permissible residual unbalance), while higher G-numbers allow more residual unbalance. The system recognizes that different equipment types have vastly different balance quality needs based on their speed, mass, application, and operating environment.

Common Balancing Grades and Their Applications

ISO 21940-11 defines grades ranging from G 0.4 (highest precision) to G 4000 (lowest precision). Here are the most commonly encountered grades:

G 0.4 – Ultra-High Precision

Applications:

• Grinding machine spindles
• Gyroscopes
• Precision measurement equipment

Characteristics: Requires specialized balancing equipment and controlled environments. Typically performed in dedicated precision balancing shops.

G 1.0 – High Precision

Applications:

• High-precision machine tool spindles
• Turbochargers
• High-speed centrifuges
• Computer disc drives

Characteristics: Demands careful control of all balancing parameters and high-quality instrumentation.

G 2.5 – Precision Industrial

Applications:

• Gas and steam turbines
• Rigid turbo-generator rotors
• Compressors
• Machine tool drives
• Medium and large electric motors (with special requirements)
• Centrifugal separators

Characteristics: Standard for high-quality, high-speed industrial equipment. Achievable with good field balancing practices.

G 6.3 – General Industrial (Most Common)

Applications:

• General-purpose electric motors
• Process industry machinery
• Centrifugal pumps
• Fans and blowers
• Gear units
• General machinery rotors
• Medium-speed compressors

Characteristics: The “standard” grade for most industrial machinery. Represents a good balance between achievability and performance. Readily achievable with portable balancing equipment.

G 16 – Heavy Industrial

Applications:

• Drive shafts (propeller shafts, cardan shafts)
• Multi-cylinder diesel engines with six or more cylinders
• Crushers
• Agricultural machinery
• Individual components of engines

Characteristics: Suitable for robust, slower-speed equipment where vibration tolerance is higher.

G 40 and Higher – Very Heavy Industrial

Applications:

• Four-cylinder diesel engines (G 40)
• Rigidly mounted slow-speed machinery
• Very large, slow-turning equipment

Characteristics: Applied to massive, slow-speed equipment where high precision balance is not economically justified or technically necessary.

How to Select the Appropriate Balancing Grade

Choosing the correct balancing grade involves considering several factors:

1. Equipment Type and Design

ISO 21940-11 provides detailed tables matching equipment types to recommended grades. This is the primary starting point for grade selection.

2. Operating Speed

Higher-speed equipment generally requires tighter balance (lower G-number) because centrifugal forces increase with the square of speed.

3. Mounting Type

Equipment mounted on flexible foundations or isolation systems can often tolerate higher G-numbers than rigidly mounted equipment.

4. Proximity to Personnel

Machinery in occupied spaces may require tighter balance for noise and safety reasons.

5. Special Requirements

Some applications (medical equipment, precision manufacturing, aerospace) demand tighter balance than standard industrial practice.

6. Economic Considerations

Each step to a tighter grade increases balancing cost. The selected grade should match operational needs without over-specifying.

Relationship Between Grade and Permissible Unbalance

The balancing grade is used to calculate the maximum permissible residual unbalance for a specific rotor:

Formula

U_per (g·mm) = (9549 × G × M) / RPM

Where:

• U_per = Permissible residual unbalance in gram-millimeters
• G = Balance quality grade number (e.g., 6.3 for G 6.3)
• M = Rotor mass in kilograms
• RPM = Service speed in revolutions per minute

Example

A 100 kg fan rotor running at 1500 RPM with grade G 6.3:

U_per = (9549 × 6.3 × 100) / 1500 = 401 g·mm

If the correction plane radius is 200 mm, this equals 2.0 grams of permissible residual unbalance.

Multi-Speed and Variable-Speed Considerations

For machinery that operates across a range of speeds:

• Constant Speed Operation: Apply the grade at the normal operating speed
• Variable Speed: Apply the grade at the maximum continuous operating speed
• Passing Through Critical Speeds: For flexible rotors, special consideration of balance at critical speeds may be needed, potentially requiring modal balancing techniques

Verification and Acceptance

After balancing is complete, the achieved balance quality must be verified against the specified grade:

Measurement Methods

• Direct Unbalance Measurement: On a balancing machine, residual unbalance is measured directly and compared to U_per
• Vibration Measurement: In field balancing, vibration amplitude is used as an indirect indicator of balance quality

Acceptance Criteria

The rotor is considered acceptable when:

• Measured residual unbalance ≤ Calculated U_per, OR
• Vibration levels meet ISO 20816 or other applicable vibration standards

Historical Context: ISO 1940 to ISO 21940

The G-grade system was originally established in ISO 1940-1 (first published in 1986). In 2016, the ISO 1940 series was revised and renumbered as the ISO 21940 series, with ISO 21940-11 replacing ISO 1940-1. The fundamental principles and grade values remained essentially unchanged, but the newer standard provides:

• Updated equipment classifications
• Clearer guidance on grade selection
• Better integration with other rotor dynamics standards
• Improved procedures for flexible rotors

Common Misconceptions

Misconception 1: “Tighter is Always Better”

Reality: Over-specifying balance quality increases costs without proportional benefit. G 2.5 equipment doesn’t necessarily perform better than G 6.3 equipment in applications where G 6.3 is appropriate.

Misconception 2: “Grade Directly Equals Vibration Level”

Reality: While related, the G-number represents permissible unbalance eccentricity, not vibration amplitude. Actual vibration depends on many factors beyond balance quality.

Misconception 3: “One Grade Fits All Equipment in a Plant”

Reality: Different equipment types require different grades even within the same facility. A precision grinder and a crusher have vastly different balance requirements.

Documentation and Specifications

When specifying balancing work, documentation should clearly state:

• Required balancing grade (e.g., “Balance to G 6.3 per ISO 21940-11”)
• Service speed for tolerance calculation
• Number of correction planes required
• Verification method (shop balancing machine or field vibration measurement)

---

← Back to Main Index