Meet Vibromera.com — our new international website. Visit Vibromera.com →
Controlled engineering worksheet

Spectral Frequency Relationship Worksheet

Convert a measured frequency to shaft order and, when you have a documented reference, compare the two numerically. This page does not identify a fault from one peak.

RPM / Hz / CPM / orderSource-controlled referenceNo fault probability
Important diagnostic boundaryA spectral peak at an expected frequency may or may not represent the corresponding fault. Amplitude pattern, harmonics and sidebands, direction, phase, time waveform, operating condition, component geometry, history and other measurements must be considered. A numerical frequency match is not a diagnosis, severity rating, alarm or maintenance instruction.

1. Measurement record

Keep the arithmetic tied to the measurement and machine state that produced it.

2. Frequency relationship

No engineering values are prefilled. Use the speed measured for the same operating state as the spectrum.

Strict decimal point or comma; no thousands separator or exponent.
Used only in direct-reference mode.
Used only in count mode; must belong to the identified shaft.
3. Evidence gates

The arithmetic is available with incomplete gates, but no diagnostic conclusion is produced.

計算外

    Running frequency
    Measured peak
    次数
    Nearest integer relationship
    Reference frequency
    Signed / absolute offset
    Relative difference
    Entered-tolerance comparison
    Evidence gates recorded

    Equations and classification

    These are unit conversions and general arithmetic. They are not formulas issued by ISO and they do not encode a diagnostic rule.

    f_r [Hz] = n [r/min] / 60
    order = f_peak [Hz] / f_r [Hz]
    count mode: f_ref [Hz] = z x f_r [Hz], where z is the documented integer count on this shaft
    delta_f = f_peak – f_ref; relative difference = |delta_f| / f_ref x 100%
    within entered tolerance only when |delta_f| <= T_entered

    The equality rule is explicit: an offset exactly equal to the entered tolerance is reported as within that tolerance. The tolerance is not generated by ISO, SKF or this page; it must be justified for the acquisition and speed variability.

    A frequency relationship is not a fault identifierEven an exact numerical match does not prove the origin of the peak, the presence of damage, its root cause, severity, remaining life or required action. Conversely, a mismatch does not exclude a fault when speed variation, slip, geometry, resolution, modulation or measurement limitations have not been resolved.

    Verified sources and evidence boundary

    IDソースVerified public/full-text supportWhat this worksheet does not infer
    S1BIPM, SI Brochure, 9th edition, version 4.01 (June 2026)The current SI brochure defines minute in relation to the second (1 min = 60 s); hertz is the SI unit s^-1.The RPM-to-Hz conversion is dimensional arithmetic, not an ISO vibration-diagnostic formula.
    S2SKF, Spectrum Analysis – The key features of analyzing spectra, CM5118 EN, pp. 4-6SKF requires machine/component identification, applicable running speed, measurement type/location, history, spectral context and multi-parameter monitoring; it states that peaks at identified fault frequencies may or may not represent the indicated fault.No single-peak probability, source ranking, severity or action is produced.
    S3SKF CM5118 EN, pp. 9-16The worked diagnostic guidance uses amplitude ratios, planes, multiple harmonics and phase; it notes that a bent-shaft signature may look identical to misalignment until phase is considered.1x, 2x, 3x or 0.5x alone is not labelled unbalance, misalignment, looseness, rub or bent shaft.
    S4SKF CM5118 EN, pp. 18 and 23Bearing defect calculations require rolling-element count, diameters and contact angle; gear mesh is teeth count times the speed of the shaft carrying that gear.Any peak above 5x/10x is not automatically a bearing or gear fault; one count is not silently treated as both blades and gear teeth.
    S5ISO 13373-1:2002, Edition 1Published and confirmed in 2024. Its public scope covers general vibration measurement and data-collection procedures, parameters, transducers, locations, attachment, operating conditions and signal conditioning.The public record does not validate universal fault-frequency scores or the former web actions. Full normative detail is NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCE.
    S6ISO 13373-2:2016, Edition 2Published; under systematic review at the audit date. Its public scope covers processing, presentation and time/frequency-domain analysis, with application-specific and refined diagnostic techniques.The abstract does not define fixed +/-order tolerances, one-peak probabilities or universal fault actions.
    S7ISO 13373-3:2015, Edition 1Published and confirmed. The public scope describes a practical structured approach to rotating-machine vibration diagnosis and examples of common faults.This page does not claim to implement the protected diagnostic procedure. Clause-level requirements are NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCE.
    S8ISO 20816-1:2016, Edition 1Published at stage 90.92. Its public scope concerns defined vibration measurements, magnitude and change, operational monitoring, acceptance and operational-limit guidance; ISO lists an expected replacement.It does not make one frequency order a fault probability. No ISO 20816 limit is embedded here.
    S9ISO/FDIS 20816-1, Edition 2Under development in the approval phase at stage 50.00; intended to replace ISO 20816-1:2016.It is not yet a published replacement and is not used as a current diagnostic or numerical criterion.
    S10ISO 10816-1:1995, Edition 1Withdrawn in 2016 and revised by ISO 20816-1:2016.It is historical, not an interchangeable current citation and not proof of a fault-source table.
    NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCENo clause, diagnostic decision tree, protected table, tolerance or severity rule is guessed from an ISO abstract. Applying ISO 13373 or machine-specific ISO 20816 criteria requires the legally available complete applicable document, amendments and competent review.

    Corrections made in this audit

    The fabricated “most likely source” and probability ranking were removed

    The old code assigned HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW labels from a single order using undocumented scores. It had no amplitude, phase, direction, trend, uncertainty or machine-specific likelihood model.

    Hidden universal matching tolerances were removed

    The former +/-0.05, +/-0.08 and expanded three-times tolerances, the greater-than-5x high-frequency rule and fixed +/-3 Hz electrical window had no stated acquisition or source basis. Comparison now requires a user-entered tolerance and its basis.

    Bearing, gear and blade relationships are no longer conflated

    A high order alone is not a bearing defect or gear problem. Direct bearing references require verified bearing geometry or manufacturer data; count mode is only the transparent z times identified-shaft relationship.

    Unsafe diagnostic and maintenance commands were removed

    The former output could recommend balancing, immediate alignment, load change, oil change, bearing replacement or an emergency response from one frequency. This worksheet generates none of those decisions.

    Withdrawn ISO 10816 and current ISO 20816 are separated

    ISO 10816-1:1995 is withdrawn. ISO 20816-1:2016 remains published but is scheduled for revision; neither public record supports a universal frequency-to-fault lookup.

    Input handling and traceability were rebuilt

    No defaults, presets, automatic calculation, local history, clipboard diagnosis, URL persistence or dynamic HTML are used. Decimal point and comma are supported under a strict grammar; mixed separators, exponents, non-finite values and invalid ranges are rejected, and changed inputs make prior results stale.

    カテゴリー:

    ワッツアップ
    バランセット-1A - 1975ユーロエンジニアに聞く