Controlled grade · rigid-rotor relation · no automatic acceptance
Residual-Unbalance Grade Relation Worksheet
Apply a balance-quality grade that has already been selected and approved for a documented rotor or assembly. The worksheet converts that controlled input into specific and total residual-unbalance magnitudes.
Derived magnitudes
Formula, units and classification
e = G / ω [mm]
ईमाइक्रोन = 1000G / ω = (30000/π)G/n [µm = g·mm/kg]
U = m · e [kg·mm] = 1000m · e [g·mm]
| प्रतीक | Quantity and unit | सीमा |
|---|---|---|
| जी | approved balance-quality grade in mm/s | controlled input; this worksheet does not select it |
| एन | documented maximum service speed in r/min | not automatically the balancing-machine speed |
| ω | angular speed in rad/s | radian is dimensionless in this product |
| ई | specific residual-unbalance magnitude, mm; numerically e in µm equals U/m in g·mm/kg | equivalent mass-eccentricity quantity, not geometric runout |
| एम | documented rotor / assembly mass in kg | must match the criterion’s component boundary |
| यू | total residual-unbalance magnitude in kg·mm or g·mm | not allocated between tolerance or correction planes |
The arithmetic is a dimensional relation derived from the stated definition of grade G; it is not presented as a verified verbatim ISO equation. The exact π expression is retained rather than replacing 30000/π by the rounded constants 9549 or 9550.
Model boundary and removed unsupported outputs
- No automatic spindle grade. The former page prescribed G0.4, G1 and G2.5 from generic speed bands and machine labels. Grade selection depends on the controlled rotor/assembly requirement; no universal spindle/toolholder preset is defensible.
- No unsupported ISO-compliance verdict. ISO 21940-11 covers rigid-rotor procedures, tolerances, correction planes, allocation and balancing errors. Three numeric inputs cannot establish all of those conditions.
- No fictitious deflection. The former code divided a derived force by a fixed 20 N/µm stiffness. Spindle/tool dynamic compliance depends on frequency, bearings, joints, clamping, tool overhang and measurement location.
- No bearing-load claim. A grade-derived limit is not an actual measured unbalance; bearing reactions additionally depend on unbalance distribution, correction planes, rotor/support dynamics and speed.
- No runout or surface-finish prediction. Equivalent specific residual unbalance is not spindle runout. Surface finish also depends on tool geometry, process forces, dynamics, material and control conditions.
- No unused tool diameter or hidden state. Diameter presets, default values, auto-calculation, URL/local storage, calculation history, clipboard output and dynamic HTML were removed.
Source traceability
| Claim | वर्गीकरण | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 21940-11:2016 Edition 1 establishes procedures and unbalance tolerances for rotors with rigid behaviour, including magnitude, correction planes, allocation and balancing-process errors; it excludes flexible-behaviour rotors. | Official ISO status and public scope; exact clauses licensed | आईएसओ 21940-11:2016 |
| Amendment 1:2022 applies to ISO 21940-11:2016 and is published. | Official ISO amendment status | ISO 21940-11:2016/Amd 1:2022 |
| ISO 21940-2:2017 Edition 1 defines balancing vocabulary and remains current after confirmation in 2022. | Official ISO status and public scope | ISO 21940-2:2017 |
| Published relation G = eप्रतिΩ for permissible specific residual eccentricity and operating angular speed. | Peer-reviewed engineering paper; independent public statement of the relation | Li et al., Advances in Mechanical Engineering 13(1), 2021, Eq. 32 |
| Permissible residual unbalance per kg (numerically µm) varies inversely with maximum service speed along constant G lines; typical rotor categories are illustrative. | Official balancing-machine manufacturer chart; visually inspected | Hofmann, Permissible residual unbalance chart (2018) |
Accessed: 15 July 2026. ISO 21940-11:2016 is published and currently under systematic review, was last confirmed in 2021 and has Amendment 1:2022. Exact grade-selection tables, plane-allocation rules, error allowances and clauses remain NEEDS_LICENSED_SOURCE; none is reconstructed here.
Reference checks
For G = 2.5 mm/s and n = 10,000 r/min, the exact relation gives e = 2.387324146… µm, consistent with the G2.5 line near 2.4 µm on the published Hofmann logarithmic chart. With m = 1 kg the same case gives U = 2.387324146… g·mm. At G = 2.5 mm/s, m = 2 kg and n = 24,000 r/min, e = 0.994718394… µm and total U = 1.989436789… g·mm.
प्रश्न
Which G grade should a machine-tool spindle use?
This worksheet deliberately does not answer that. Use the applicable current licensed requirement, the spindle and toolholder manufacturer specifications, the exact assembly configuration and an engineer-approved acceptance plan.
Is e the spindle runout?
No. Here e is an equivalent specific residual-unbalance magnitude. Geometric or dynamic runout is a different measured quantity.
Can total U be divided equally between two planes?
Not automatically. The permissible total and its allocation to tolerance/correction planes depend on the controlled rotor geometry, support and procedure. Use the applicable standard and balancing plan.