Free Engineering Tool
Trial Weight Calculator for Rotor Balancing
Calculate the recommended trial weight mass for single-plane rotor balancing. Accounts for rotor mass, speed, correction radius, support stiffness, and vibration severity.
Results
Trial Weight Formula
The trial weight mass is calculated using a practical engineering formula that accounts for support conditions and vibration severity:
- Mt — trial weight mass (g)
- Mr — rotor mass (g) — enter in kg, converted to grams internally
- Ksupp — support stiffness coefficient (0.5–5.0)
- Kvib — vibration level coefficient (0.5–3.0) — derived from measured vibration in mm/s
- Rt — trial weight installation radius (cm) — enter in mm, converted to cm internally
- N — rotor speed (RPM)
Support Stiffness Coefficient (Ksupp)
This coefficient accounts for how the machine support structure affects the vibration response to unbalance:
| Ksupp | Support Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | Very rigid | Massive concrete block, stiff steel structure. Vibration barely changes with unbalance — need heavier trial weight (high Ksupp). |
| 4.0 | Rigid | Concrete foundation, stiff pedestal. Typical for large pumps and compressors. |
| 2.0–3.0 | Medium | Standard industrial mount, baseplate on concrete. Most common situation for fans, motors, and general machinery. |
| 1.0 | Flexible | Spring mounts, rubber isolators. Machine vibrates freely — lighter trial weight sufficient (low Ksupp). |
| 0.5 | Very flexible | Suspended mount, soft isolators, balancing jig/cradle. Maximum vibration response — lightest trial weight. |
Rule of thumb: Rigid supports (Ksupp = 4–5) “absorb” vibration, so you need a heavier trial weight to produce a measurable change. Flexible supports (Ksupp = 0.5–1) amplify the response, so a lighter trial weight works.
Vibration Level Coefficient (Kvib)
This coefficient reflects the current vibration severity of the machine before balancing:
| Kvib | Vibration Level | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Low (< 2 mm/s) | Machine runs smoothly. Fine-tuning only. Lighter trial weight — otherwise may overpower existing unbalance signal. |
| 2 | Moderate (2–4.5 mm/s) | Noticeable vibration. Standard balancing job. |
| 3 | Elevated (4.5–7.1 mm/s) | Clear unbalance problem. Typical field balancing scenario. Default choice. |
| 5 | High (7.1–11 mm/s) | Significant unbalance. Urgent balancing needed. Larger trial weight OK — vibration is already high. |
| 8 | Very high (> 11 mm/s) | Dangerous level. Large unbalance. Heavier trial weight acceptable to ensure measurable vector change. |
Why This Formula Works
The formula Mt = Mr × Ksupp × Kvib / (Rt × (N/100)²) captures the key physics:
- Heavier rotors need heavier trial weights (linear with Mr)
- Higher speeds generate more centrifugal force per gram, so less trial weight is needed (inverse square of N)
- Larger radius means more moment per gram, so less weight needed (inverse of Rt)
- Stiffer supports need more weight to produce detectable vibration change (higher Ksupp = 4–5)
- Flexible supports amplify the response, so less weight is needed (lower Ksupp = 0.5–1)
- Higher existing vibration means larger existing unbalance — proportionally larger trial weight (higher Kvib)
Practical Example
Given: Mr = 111 kg = 111,000 g, N = 1111 RPM, Rt = 111 mm = 11.1 cm, Ksupp = 1.0, Vibration = 11 mm/s → Kvib = 1.5
Step 1: Speed factor: (N/100)² = (1111/100)² = 11.11² = 123.43
Step 2: Denominator: Rt(cm) × (N/100)² = 11.1 × 123.43 = 1,370.1
Step 3: Numerator: Mr(g) × Ksupp × Kvib = 111,000 × 1.0 × 1.5 = 166,500
Step 4: Mt = 166,500 / 1,370.1 = 121.5 g
Result: Use approximately 122 g trial weight at 111 mm radius.
⚠️ Safety Note: An excessively heavy trial weight can cause dangerously high vibration. If the calculated weight seems too large, start with half and increase gradually. Always ensure the trial weight is securely attached and cannot detach during rotation.
Comparison with ISO 21940 Method
The classic ISO approach uses balance grade G to calculate permissible unbalance, then takes 5–10% as trial weight. This Vibromera formula is a practical field shortcut that gives similar results while directly accounting for real-world conditions (support stiffness and current vibration level) that the ISO method assumes are ideal.
Professional field balancing instruments and software. Achieve ISO 21940-11 compliance on-site with Balanset series devices. Used in 50+ countries.
Nikolai Shelkovenko
Nikolai Shelkovenko is a vibration analysis engineer and the founder and CEO of Vibromera. For more than 15 years he has balanced rotating equipment in the field rather than on a test bench: mulchers, industrial fans, crushers, centrifuges, shafts and spindles. That work is what the Balanset instruments grew out of — they were designed as a tool a specialist can carry to the machine and use alone, on site, not as laboratory equipment. Vibromera was founded in 2017 and has been based in Porto, Portugal, since 2023. Development, assembly and support of the Balanset line all happen here. The flagship instrument is the Balanset-1A, a portable analyser for single- and two-plane balancing and for vibration diagnostics. Nikolai is personally involved in customer support, in working through difficult balancing cases and in the development of the software. He works with customers worldwide, in any language.