Susipažinkite su Vibromera.com — naująja tarptautine mūsų svetaine. Apsilankykite Vibromera.com →

Rotorių balansavimas tekinimo staklėse: Ekonomiškas sprendimas gaminių kokybei gerinti

Šiuolaikinėje gamybos pramonėje, kur produkto kokybė yra svarbiausia, rotoriaus balansavimas tampa neatsiejama technologinio proceso dalimi. Tačiau specializuotos balansavimo įrangos įsigijimas mažoms ir vidutinėms įmonėms gali būti brangus. Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjame galimybę naudoti tekinimo stakles rotorius balansavimui, kuris gali žymiai sumažinti įrangos išlaidas ir padidinti gamybos efektyvumą.

Tekinimo staklės - balansavimo įrankis

The lathe, due to its design and functionality, can be successfully used for balancing rotors of various types and sizes. The main advantage of this approach is cost savings, as there is no need to purchase expensive specialized equipment. Additionally, using a lathe allows for balancing to be carried out directly during the rotor’s manufacturing process, which shortens production time and improves product quality.

Pasirengimas balansavimui

Prieš pradedant balansavimo procesą, reikia atlikti keletą parengiamųjų veiksmų:

  • Tinkamų tekinimo staklių pasirinkimas: Tekinimo staklės turi būti pakankamai standžios ir tikslios, kad būtų užtikrintas patikimas rotoriaus tvirtinimas ir tikslūs vibracijos matavimai.
  • Matavimo sistemos diegimas: Rotoriaus matavimui vibracija ant tekinimo staklių, nešiojamas balansavimo įrenginys, pavyzdžiui, Balanset-1A gali būti naudojamas. Jame yra vibracijos jutikliai, tachometras, taip pat programinė įranga, skirta duomenų analizei ir korekcinių masių apskaičiavimui.
  • Dealing with the spindle’s own unbalance: You do not have to balance the lathe spindle itself. Run the lathe with the chuck alone (rotor removed) and record the vibration vector: that is the baseline contributed by the spindle and chuck. If it is a significant fraction of the rotor reading, either subtract it, or — better — use the 180° index run (the “Mandrel eccentricity elimination” function, “F7 - Run Ecc”), which automatically separates everything that does not rotate with the rotor.
  • Matching the rotor to the machine, not to the spindle: What matters is that the rotor’s unbalance force produces a measurable response on the bearing housings. A heavy, rigid lathe responds very little per gram of unbalance, so on a very light rotor the signal disappears in the noise, while a very heavy rotor may exceed the rated load of the chuck or the bearings. In practice, check that a properly sized trial weight gives a clean, repeatable amplitude and phase change before you trust any influence coefficient.
  • Checking the runout of the rubber cover before balancing: On a rubberized shaft, mass unbalance and geometric runout of the covering are two different defects. Balancing cancels the 1× force; it cannot make an eccentric or oval cover round. Set a dial indicator against the covered surface and turn the shaft by hand: if the total indicated runout exceeds the product tolerance, grind or turn the cover concentric first — on the same lathe — and only then balance. A shaft that is balanced but still runs out will keep producing gauge bands, streaks and nip-pressure variation no matter how low the vibration reading gets.

Šiame straipsnyje išsamiai aprašysiu mūsų patirtį ir metodiką dinamiškai balansuojant rubberized shafts on a lathe machine – a solution that, admittedly, I was initially skeptical of due to the inherent rigidity and substantial weight of such machinery. Surprisingly, the operation was seamlessly executed, achieving the G 6.3 balance quality grade (ISO 21940-11, formerly ISO 1940-1).

Gumuotas velenas, sumontuotas ant tekinimo staklių, dinaminio balansavimo pagal ISO 1940-1 tikslais

Rotorių balansavimo procesas tekinimo staklėse teoriškai

Rotoriaus balansavimo procesas tekinimo staklėmis apima šiuos veiksmus:

Rotoriaus tvirtinimas

Rotorius tvirtai pritvirtinamas tekinimo staklių griebtuve arba ant centrų, kad būtų užtikrintas stabilumas balansavimo proceso metu.

Jutiklių montavimas

Fit one vibration sensor per correction plane — one on the headstock bearing housing and one on the tailstock or steady-rest housing — radially, as close to the bearing as possible, on a clean machined metal surface via a magnetic base. Do not mount sensors on the lathe bed, the apron or a guard: the 1× signal there is attenuated and dominated by the structure. Stick the atspindinti juosta on a metal face (the shaft end or the chuck), not on the rubber covering, and aim the laser tachometer perpendicular to it.

Pradinės vibracijos matavimas

The initial vibration level is measured at the speed you will use for the whole job. All runs — Run 0, the trial runs and the trim run — must be made at the same speed, because the influence coefficients are only valid for the speed at which they were measured.

Accounting for Eccentricity (immediately after Run 0)

Fixture and mandrel ekscentriškumas adds a vector to the Run 0 reading that is not unbalance, and correcting for it would be wrong. Deal with it before the trial weight, not afterwards: tick the “Mandrel eccentricity elimination” checkbox in the Balanset-1A software, complete Run 0, then rotate the rotor 180° in the fixture and press “F7 - Run Ecc”. The software takes the vector half-sum as the eccentricity and the vector half-difference as the true unbalance, and only then unlocks the trial run. Doing this after the correction weights are already welded on means recalculating and redoing them.

How big should a trial weight be?

A safe starting point is a weight whose centrifugal force stays within 5–10% of the rotor weight. As a formula:

mbandymas = k · M · g / (R · ω²), k = 0.05–0.10

kur M is the rotor mass (kg), g = 9.81 m/s², R is the mounting radius of the weight (m), and ω = 2π·RPM/60 (rad/s). Example: a 50 kg rotor at 3,000 rpm with the weight at R = 0.2 m gives m ≈ 0.07·50·9.81/(0.2·314²) ≈ 1.7 g — grams, not hundreds of grams. That looks surprisingly small for a 50 kg rotor, but check the force: at 3,000 rpm those 1.7 g already pull F = m·R·ω² ≈ 34 N — about 7% of the rotor’s weight. Starting small is the point: stepping up is cheap, while an oversized weight is a real load on bearings and welds. The same force check works in reverse for any weight you are about to bolt on.

You don’t have to compute this by hand: the Balanset software includes a First Trial Weight Estimator that recommends both the mass and the starting angle from your rotor data, and a Bump testas to check that you are not working near a natural frequency.

A good trial weight changes the reading by at least 20–30% in amplitude or 20–30° in phase. If the response is smaller, increase the weight stepwise — never jump straight to a heavy weight “to see something happen.”

Installing a Trial Weight

A bandomasis svoris of known mass is installed on the rotor, and the vibration is measured again. For two-plane balancing this is done in each plane in turn — a trial run with the weight in plane 1 (Run 1), then a trial run with the weight in plane 2 (Run 2) — so the software can measure the influence of each correction plane separately.

Korekcinių masių skaičiavimas

Programinė įranga "Balanset-1A" analizuoja matavimo rezultatus ir apskaičiuoja reikalingas korekcines mases bei jų išdėstymo kampus.

Rotoriaus masės koregavimas

Priklausomai nuo rotoriaus konstrukcijos ir tekinimo staklių galimybių, masė gali būti koreguojama gręžiant, frezuojant, suvirinant ar kitais būdais.

Balansavimo tikrinimas

Atlikus pataisymus, atliekamas kontrolinis vibracijos matavimas. Jei reikia, procesas kartojamas, kol pasiekiamas reikiamas pusiausvyros lygis.

Dynamic Balancing in Practice

  • Sukimosi dažnis: Typically, the working rotation speed of these shafts ranges between 300 to 500 revolutions per minute (rpm). In this particular case, we carried out the balancing at 550 rpm.
  • Nustatymas: Ant tekinimo staklių buvo sumontuotas gumuotas velenas, po to strategiškai išdėstyti jutikliai, kaip parodyta pridedamose nuotraukose.
Workshop view of the balancing setup: the lathe with sensor cables and the laptop running the Balanset-1A software

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

Dinaminis gumuotų velenų balansavimas

Dinaminis gumuotų velenų balansavimas

  • Pradiniai vibracijos rodmenys: Prieš atliekant balansavimą, pradinis vibration readings stood at 9 mm/s and 17 mm/s.
  • Trial Runs: A two-plane job needs a trial run in each plane in turn — Run 1 with the weight in plane 1, then Run 2 with the weight in plane 2. A trial weight of 340 grams was welded on; it altered the vibration and fazė readings by roughly 10%. Treat such a response as a bare minimum: for a clear, confident measurement we normally aim for a trial weight that shifts the vibration vector by 25–50%, but a heavy, rigid lathe responds very little per gram of trial mass.

Bandomojo svorio padėjimas ant gumuoto veleno tekinimo staklių balansavimo metu

  • Balansavimo koregavimai: Post the trial runs with the trial weight, our Balanset-1A instrument indicated the need for the addition of 3100 grams on one side of the shaft and 4300 grams on the other, corresponding to corrections in dvi plokštumos. After these adjustments, vibration levels decreased to 2 mm/s and 4 mm/s.
End flange of the grooved rubberized roller in the lathe, with the correction area highlighted and the laser tachometer dot on the journal

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

Stacked correction weights welded inside the open end of the roller shell

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

  • Tikslus derinimas: To further optimize results, we proceeded to add weights of 400 grams and 700 grams. Subsequently, another round of fine-tuning was executed by adding 200 grams and 400 grams. Due to spatial constraints, the weights were welded atop one another. Ultimately, these temporary weights were replaced with precision-cut, aesthetically pleasing counterweights crafted specifically for this shaft. The final vibration readings were an impressive 0.1 mm/s in both planes (a rounded figure — below 1 mm/s the instrument itself displays readings to three decimal places).
Machined segment counterweight fitted on the red end flange of the grooved rubberized roller

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

Balanced rubberized roller resting on wooden pallets with a small welded correction weight on its end flange

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

Machined sector counterweight installed around the hub on the roller end flange

Gumuotų velenų dinaminis balansavimas vietoje naudojant tekinimo stakles

Vibracijos jutiklis

Optinis jutiklis (lazerinis tachometras)

Balanset-4

Magnetinis stovas Insize-60-kgf

Refleksinė juosta

Rotorių balansavimo tekinimo staklėse privalumai

Ekonominis efektyvumas

Naudojant tekinimo stakles balansavimui išvengiama išlaidų, susijusių su specializuotos balansavimo įrangos įsigijimu.

Patogumas

Balansavimas gali būti atliekamas tiesiogiai rotoriaus gamybos proceso metu, todėl sutrumpėja gamybos laikas.

Aukšta kokybė

Šiuolaikiniai nešiojamieji balansavimo įrenginiai, tokie kaip "Balanset-1A", užtikrina aukštą balansavimo tikslumą, mažą vibracijos lygį ir geresnę gaminių kokybę.

Išvada

Rotorių balansavimas tekinimo staklėse yra veiksmingas ir ekonomiškas sprendimas įmonėms, siekiančioms pagerinti gaminių kokybę ir sumažinti gamybos sąnaudas. Naudojant tokius nešiojamus balansavimo įrenginius, kaip "Balanset-1A", šis procesas tampa paprastas ir prieinamas net mažoms dirbtuvėms.

Svarbūs priminimai

Rotorių balansavimas tekinimo staklėse - tai žingsnis į jūsų gamybos ateitį, kuris atsiperka geresne gaminių kokybe, mažesnėmis sąnaudomis ir didesniu jūsų verslo konkurencingumu.


0 Pastabos

Parašykite komentarą

Avataro vietos laikiklis
WhatsApp
Balanset-1A - 1975 €Paklauskite inžinieriaus