Kenali Vibromera.com — situs web internasional baru kami. Kunjungi Vibromera.com →

Penyeimbangan Rotor pada Mesin Bubut: Solusi Hemat Biaya untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk

Dalam manufaktur modern, di mana kualitas produk sangatlah penting, penyeimbangan rotor menjadi bagian penting dari proses teknologi. Namun, pembelian peralatan penyeimbangan khusus dapat memakan biaya besar bagi usaha kecil dan menengah. Dalam artikel ini, kami mengeksplorasi kemungkinan penggunaan mesin bubut untuk rotor penyeimbangan, yang dapat secara signifikan mengurangi biaya peralatan dan meningkatkan efisiensi produksi.

Mesin Bubut sebagai Alat untuk Menyeimbangkan

The lathe, due to its design and functionality, can be successfully used for balancing rotors of various types and sizes. The main advantage of this approach is cost savings, as there is no need to purchase expensive specialized equipment. Additionally, using a lathe allows for balancing to be carried out directly during the rotor’s manufacturing process, which shortens production time and improves product quality.

Persiapan untuk Menyeimbangkan

Sebelum memulai proses penyeimbangan, beberapa langkah persiapan harus dilakukan:

  • Memilih mesin bubut yang sesuai: Mesin bubut harus memiliki kekakuan dan presisi yang cukup untuk memastikan pemasangan rotor yang andal dan pengukuran getaran yang akurat.
  • Memasang sistem pengukuran: Untuk mengukur rotor getaran pada mesin bubut, dapat digunakan alat penyeimbang portabel seperti Balanset-1A dapat digunakan. Alat ini mencakup sensor getaran, sebuah takometer, dan perangkat lunak untuk analisis data serta perhitungan massa koreksi.
  • Dealing with the spindle’s own unbalance: You do not have to balance the lathe spindle itself. Run the lathe with the chuck alone (rotor removed) and record the vibration vector: that is the baseline contributed by the spindle and chuck. If it is a significant fraction of the rotor reading, either subtract it, or — better — use the 180° index run (the “Mandrel eccentricity elimination” function, “F7 - Run Ecc”), which automatically separates everything that does not rotate with the rotor.
  • Matching the rotor to the machine, not to the spindle: What matters is that the rotor’s unbalance force produces a measurable response on the bearing housings. A heavy, rigid lathe responds very little per gram of unbalance, so on a very light rotor the signal disappears in the noise, while a very heavy rotor may exceed the rated load of the chuck or the bearings. In practice, check that a properly sized trial weight gives a clean, repeatable amplitude and phase change before you trust any influence coefficient.
  • Checking the runout of the rubber cover before balancing: On a rubberized shaft, mass unbalance and geometric runout of the covering are two different defects. Balancing cancels the 1× force; it cannot make an eccentric or oval cover round. Set a dial indicator against the covered surface and turn the shaft by hand: if the total indicated runout exceeds the product tolerance, grind or turn the cover concentric first — on the same lathe — and only then balance. A shaft that is balanced but still runs out will keep producing gauge bands, streaks and nip-pressure variation no matter how low the vibration reading gets.

Dalam artikel ini, saya akan menjabarkan pengalaman dan metodologi kami dalam penyeimbangan dinamis rubberized shafts on a lathe machine – a solution that, admittedly, I was initially skeptical of due to the inherent rigidity and substantial weight of such machinery. Surprisingly, the operation was seamlessly executed, achieving the G 6.3 balance quality grade (ISO 21940-11, formerly ISO 1940-1).

Poros berlapis karet yang dipasang pada mesin bubut untuk balancing dinamis sesuai ISO 1940-1

Proses Penyeimbangan Rotor pada Mesin Bubut secara teori

Proses penyeimbangan rotor pada mesin bubut melibatkan langkah-langkah berikut:

Mengamankan Rotor

Rotor dipasang dengan aman di chuck mesin bubut atau di bagian tengah untuk memastikan stabilitas selama proses penyeimbangan.

Memasang Sensor

Fit one vibration sensor per correction plane — one on the headstock bearing housing and one on the tailstock or steady-rest housing — radially, as close to the bearing as possible, on a clean machined metal surface via a magnetic base. Do not mount sensors on the lathe bed, the apron or a guard: the 1× signal there is attenuated and dominated by the structure. Stick the pita reflektif on a metal face (the shaft end or the chuck), not on the rubber covering, and aim the laser tachometer perpendicular to it.

Mengukur Getaran Awal

The initial vibration level is measured at the speed you will use for the whole job. All runs — Run 0, the trial runs and the trim run — must be made at the same speed, because the influence coefficients are only valid for the speed at which they were measured.

Accounting for Eccentricity (immediately after Run 0)

Fixture and mandrel eksentrisitas adds a vector to the Run 0 reading that is not unbalance, and correcting for it would be wrong. Deal with it before the trial weight, not afterwards: tick the “Mandrel eccentricity elimination” checkbox in the Balanset-1A software, complete Run 0, then rotate the rotor 180° in the fixture and press “F7 - Run Ecc”. The software takes the vector half-sum as the eccentricity and the vector half-difference as the true unbalance, and only then unlocks the trial run. Doing this after the correction weights are already welded on means recalculating and redoing them.

How big should a trial weight be?

A safe starting point is a weight whose centrifugal force stays within 5–10% of the rotor weight. As a formula:

msidang = k · M · g / (R · ω²), k = 0.05–0.10

di mana M is the rotor mass (kg), g = 9.81 m/s², R is the mounting radius of the weight (m), and ω = 2π·RPM/60 (rad/s). Example: a 50 kg rotor at 3,000 rpm with the weight at R = 0.2 m gives m ≈ 0.07·50·9.81/(0.2·314²) ≈ 1.7 g — grams, not hundreds of grams. That looks surprisingly small for a 50 kg rotor, but check the force: at 3,000 rpm those 1.7 g already pull F = m·R·ω² ≈ 34 N — about 7% of the rotor’s weight. Starting small is the point: stepping up is cheap, while an oversized weight is a real load on bearings and welds. The same force check works in reverse for any weight you are about to bolt on.

You don’t have to compute this by hand: the Balanset software includes a First Trial Weight Estimator that recommends both the mass and the starting angle from your rotor data, and a Uji Tabrakan to check that you are not working near a natural frequency.

A good trial weight changes the reading by at least 20–30% in amplitude or 20–30° in phase. If the response is smaller, increase the weight stepwise — never jump straight to a heavy weight “to see something happen.”

Installing a Trial Weight

A berat uji coba of known mass is installed on the rotor, and the vibration is measured again. For two-plane balancing this is done in each plane in turn — a trial run with the weight in plane 1 (Run 1), then a trial run with the weight in plane 2 (Run 2) — so the software can measure the influence of each correction plane separately.

Menghitung Massa Korektif

Perangkat lunak Balanset-1A menganalisis hasil pengukuran dan menghitung massa koreksi yang diperlukan serta sudut penempatannya.

Mengoreksi Massa Rotor

Tergantung pada desain rotor dan kemampuan mesin bubut, koreksi massa dapat dilakukan dengan pengeboran, penggilingan, pengelasan, atau metode lainnya.

Verifikasi Penyeimbangan

Setelah melakukan koreksi, pengukuran getaran kontrol dilakukan. Proses ini diulangi jika perlu sampai tingkat keseimbangan yang diperlukan tercapai.

Dynamic Balancing in Practice

  • Frekuensi Rotasi: Typically, the working rotation speed of these shafts ranges between 300 to 500 revolutions per minute (rpm). In this particular case, we carried out the balancing at 550 rpm.
  • Pengaturan: Poros karet dipasang pada mesin bubut, diikuti oleh penempatan sensor yang strategis, seperti yang digambarkan dalam foto-foto yang menyertainya.
Workshop view of the balancing setup: the lathe with sensor cables and the laptop running the Balanset-1A software

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet

  • Pembacaan Getaran Awal: Sebelum penyeimbangan, awal vibration readings stood at 9 mm/s and 17 mm/s.
  • Trial Runs: A two-plane job needs a trial run in each plane in turn — Run 1 with the weight in plane 1, then Run 2 with the weight in plane 2. A trial weight of 340 grams was welded on; it altered the vibration and fase readings by roughly 10%. Treat such a response as a bare minimum: for a clear, confident measurement we normally aim for a trial weight that shifts the vibration vector by 25–50%, but a heavy, rigid lathe responds very little per gram of trial mass.

Penempatan beban uji pada poros berlapis karet selama balancing dengan mesin bubut

  • Penyesuaian Keseimbangan: Post the trial runs with the trial weight, our Balanset-1A instrument indicated the need for the addition of 3100 grams on one side of the shaft and 4300 grams on the other, corresponding to corrections in dua pesawat. After these adjustments, vibration levels decreased to 2 mm/s and 4 mm/s.
End flange of the grooved rubberized roller in the lathe, with the correction area highlighted and the laser tachometer dot on the journal

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

Stacked correction weights welded inside the open end of the roller shell

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

  • Penyempurnaan: To further optimize results, we proceeded to add weights of 400 grams and 700 grams. Subsequently, another round of fine-tuning was executed by adding 200 grams and 400 grams. Due to spatial constraints, the weights were welded atop one another. Ultimately, these temporary weights were replaced with precision-cut, aesthetically pleasing counterweights crafted specifically for this shaft. The final vibration readings were an impressive 0.1 mm/s in both planes (a rounded figure — below 1 mm/s the instrument itself displays readings to three decimal places).
Machined segment counterweight fitted on the red end flange of the grooved rubberized roller

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

Balanced rubberized roller resting on wooden pallets with a small welded correction weight on its end flange

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

Machined sector counterweight installed around the hub on the roller end flange

Penyeimbangan Dinamis Poros Karet di Tempat Menggunakan Mesin Bubut

Sensor getaran

Sensor Optik (Takometer Laser)

Balanset-4

Dudukan magnetik Insize-60-kgf

Pita reflektif

Penyeimbang dinamis “Balanset-1A” OEM

Keuntungan dari Penyeimbangan Rotor pada Mesin Bubut

Efektivitas Biaya

Menggunakan mesin bubut untuk penyeimbangan menghindari biaya pembelian peralatan penyeimbangan khusus.

Kenyamanan

Penyeimbangan dapat dilakukan secara langsung selama proses pembuatan rotor, sehingga mengurangi waktu produksi.

Kualitas Tinggi

Penyeimbang portabel modern, seperti Balanset-1A, memberikan akurasi penyeimbangan yang tinggi, sehingga memungkinkan tingkat getaran yang rendah dan kualitas produk yang lebih baik.

Kesimpulan

Penyeimbangan rotor pada mesin bubut merupakan solusi yang efektif dan ekonomis untuk bisnis yang ingin meningkatkan kualitas produk dan mengurangi biaya produksi. Penggunaan penyeimbang portabel seperti Balanset-1A membuat proses ini menjadi sederhana dan mudah diakses, bahkan untuk bengkel kecil.

Pengingat Penting

Menyeimbangkan rotor pada mesin bubut merupakan langkah menuju masa depan produksi Anda, yang akan terbayar melalui peningkatan kualitas produk, pengurangan biaya, dan peningkatan daya saing bisnis Anda.


Komentar 0

Tinggalkan Balasan

Penampung avatar
WhatsApp
Balanset-1A - €1975Tanyakan kepada insinyur