Meet Vibromera.com — our new international website. Visit Vibromera.com →


Controlled nominal-mechanics worksheet

Average axial, average direct-shear and elastic bending stress

Evaluate one documented section and one internal resultant. The worksheet reports an keskiarvo axial/direct-shear value or a nominal extreme-fiber elastic bending value—never a local peak or design acceptance.

Signed resultantsExact unit normalizationNo presetsNo allowable stress
Boundary: determine internal resultants from a valid free-body analysis first. Holes, threads, multiple shear planes, eccentricity, contact, stress concentration, beam shear distribution, multiaxial loading, buckling, plasticity, fatigue and fracture are outside this scalar worksheet.

1. Calculation mode and section inputs

Use the internal axial resultant N or direct-shear resultant V at the documented cut—not an unverified external load.

Document net/gross area, holes/threads and number of shear planes in the section record.

Use the modulus for the stated bending axis and reported extreme fiber; asymmetric sections may require separate W values.

2. Controlled section record

3. Confirmations

4. Result

Signed nominal value
Signed nominal value
Magnitude
Luokitus

Method and applicability

Average axial normal stress

σkeskiarvo = N/A

  • Internal axial resultant through the section centroid.
  • Uniform average sufficiently away from load introduction and discontinuities.
  • Not eccentric bending or a local notch/thread stress.

Average direct-shear stress

τkeskiarvo = V/A

  • Reports only the sectional average.
  • The real distribution generally is not uniform.
  • Not the beam formula VQ/(It), bearing stress or torsional shear.

Nominal elastic bending stress

σnom = M/W = Mc/I

  • Linearly elastic simple flexure and correct neutral axis.
  • W = I/c for the stated axis and extreme fiber.
  • Not plastic, composite, curved-beam or local peak stress.

Dimensional identities used: N/mm² = MPa; N·mm/mm³ = MPa. The sign is preserved from the documented internal-force convention. Strength, allowables, partial/safety factors and acceptance criteria are deliberately absent.

Sources and classification

Luokitus: these are bounded general-mechanics relationships, not formulas attributed to ISO, ASME, ASTM, EN or another design standard. Any actual allowable, resistance, load combination, stress concentration, fatigue method or acceptance rule requires its controlled governing source.

Categories:

WhatsApp
Balanset-1A - €1975Kysy insinööriltä