Meet Vibromera.com — our new international website. Visit Vibromera.com →
Dynamic Shaft Balancing Instruction – ISO 21940 | Vibromera
Balanceo en campo · Guía completa

Dynamic Shaft Balancing Instruction: Static vs Dynamic, Field Procedure & ISO 21940 Grades

Everything a field engineer needs to balance rotors on-site — from the physics of unbalance to the final verification run. Seven-step procedure, trial weight formulas, correction angle measurement, and ISO tolerance tables. Based on Vibromera field work across fans, mulchers, crushers, and shafts.

✎ Nikolai Shelkovenko Updated: Feb 2026 ~18 min de lectura

¿Qué es el balanceo dinámico?

Definición

Balanceo dinámico is the process of measuring and correcting the uneven mass distribution of a rotating body (rotor) while it spins at operating speed. Unlike static balancing, which corrects mass offset in a single plane, dynamic balancing addresses imbalance in two or more planes simultaneously, eliminating both centrifugal force and rocking couple that cause bearing vibration.

Every rotating part — from a 200 kg mulcher rotor to a 5 g dental drill spindle — has some residual unbalance. Manufacturing tolerances, material inconsistencies, corrosion, and accumulated deposits shift the mass centre away from the geometric rotation axis. The result is a centrifugal force that grows with the square of speed: double the RPM and the force quadruples.

A rotor spinning at 3,000 RPM with just 10 g of unbalance at a 150 mm radius generates roughly 150 N of rotating force — enough to destroy bearings in weeks. Dynamic balancing reduces this force to a level specified by international standards (ISO 21940‑11, formerly ISO 1940), extending bearing life from months to years and cutting vibration‑related downtime.

Field engineer's note
In 13 years of field work, unbalance has been the root cause in roughly 40% of the vibration complaints I investigate. It is also the easiest fault to fix on‑site — a trained technician with the right instrument finishes in 30–45 minutes without removing the rotor.

Balanceo estático vs dinámico

Un solo plano
Rotor in static imbalance — heavy point rotates to the bottom
Balanceo estático

The rotor's centre of gravity is offset from the rotation axis in un plano. Al colocarse sobre soportes de cuchilla, el lado pesado rueda hacia abajo: esto se puede detectar sin girar.

Corrección: agregar o retirar masa en una sola posición angular opuesta al punto pesado. Un solo plano de corrección es suficiente.

Aplica a: narrow disc-shaped parts where L/D is below about 0.5 - flywheels, grinding wheels, single-disc impellers, saw blades, brake discs.

Dos planos
Long rotor in dynamic imbalance — two mass offsets in different planes
Balanceo dinámico

Dos (o más) desplazamientos de masa se encuentran en planos diferentes a lo largo del rotor. Pueden cancelarse entre sí estáticamente: el rotor permanece quieto sobre los soportes de cuchilla, pero generan un par de fuerzas oscilante al girar. Este par no puede detectarse ni corregirse sin rotación.

Corrección: dos pesos de compensación en dos planos separados. El instrumento calcula la masa y el ángulo para cada plano a partir de la matriz de coeficientes de influencia.

Aplica a: rotores alargados: ejes, ventiladores con impulsores anchos, rotores de mulcher, rodillos, impulsores de bombas multietapa, turbinas.

Distinción clave: un rotor balanceado estáticamente aún puede tener un desbalance dinámico severo. Las fuerzas en un plano se oponen exactamente a las de otro, por lo que el rotor no rueda sobre los soportes, pero en el momento en que gira, el par genera vibraciones violentas en los rodamientos. El balanceo dinámico en dos planos detecta lo que los métodos estáticos pasan por alto.

Cuatro tipos de desbalance

La norma ISO 21940-11 distingue cuatro patrones fundamentales de desbalance. Comprender cuál predomina ayuda a elegir la estrategia de balanceo correcta.

Estático
Punto pesado único. El centro de gravedad desplazado paralelo al eje de rotación. Detectable en reposo. Corrección en un solo plano.
Par
Dos masas iguales separadas 180° en planos diferentes. Fuerza neta = 0, pero genera un torque (par). Invisible en reposo.
Cuasi-estático
Combinación de estático + par donde el eje principal de inercia intersecta el eje de rotación en un punto distinto al centro de gravedad.
Dinámico
Caso general: el eje principal de inercia ni intersecta ni es paralelo al eje de rotación. El patrón más común en la práctica. Corrección en dos planos obligatoria.

En la práctica, casi todos los rotores que se encuentran en campo tienen desbalance dinámico: una combinación de componentes de fuerza y par. Por eso, el balanceo en dos planos es el procedimiento predeterminado para cualquier rotor que no sea un disco delgado.

When to Use Single‑Plane vs Two‑Plane Balancing

The deciding factor is the rotor's geometry ratio L/D (axial length to outer diameter) combined with its operating speed.

Criterio Single‑Plane (1 sensor) Two‑Plane (2 sensors)
L/D ratio L/D < 0.5 (narrow disc-like rotor) L/D >= 0.5, or significant axial mass distribution
Typical parts Grinding wheel, flywheel, single‑disc impeller, pulley, brake disc, saw blade Fan rotor, mulcher, shaft, roller, multi‑stage pump, turbine, crusher
Unbalance types corrected Static only (force) Static + couple + dynamic (force + moment)
Planos de corrección 1 2
Measurement runs 2 (initial + 1 trial) 3 (initial + 2 trials, one per plane)
Time on site 15–20 min 30–45 min
Regla general
If the correction planes are separated by less than about one third of the rotor bearing span, cross-coupling between planes is strong and single-plane balancing can leave a large residual at the far bearing. Maximise plane separation whenever possible; if you have a two-channel instrument, use two planes for elongated rotors.

ISO 21940‑11 Balance Quality Grades

ISO 21940‑11 (the successor to ISO 1940‑1) assigns each class of rotating machinery a balance quality grade G, defined as the maximum permissible velocity of the rotor's centre of gravity in mm/s. The permissible residual specific unbalance epor (in g·mm/kg) is derived from the grade and the operating speed:

Desbalance específico permisible
epor = G × 1000 / ω = G × 1000 / (2π × RPM / 60)
epor — permissible residual specific unbalance, g·mm/kg
G — balance quality grade (e.g. 6.3 means 6.3 mm/s)
ω — angular velocity, rad/s
RPM — operating speed, rev/min
Grado e·ω, mm/s Tipos de máquina
G 0.4 0.4 Gyroscopes, spindles of precision grinding machines
G 1.0 1.0 Turbochargers, gas turbines, small electric armatures with special requirements
G 2.5 2.5 Electric motors, generators, medium/large turbines, pumps with special requirements
G 6.3 6.3 Fans, pumps, process machinery, flywheels, centrifuges, general industrial machinery
G 16 16 Agricultural machinery, crushers, drive shafts (cardan), parts of crushing machines
G 40 40 Passenger car wheels, crankshaft assemblies (series production)
G 100 100 Fast diesel engine crankshaft assemblies with six or more cylinders

Worked Example: Fan Rotor

A centrifugal fan rotor weighs 80 kg, operates at 1,450 RPM, and the correction radius is 250 mm. Required grade: G 6.3.

Cálculo
epor = 6.3 × 1000 / (2π × 1450 / 60) = 6300 / 151.8 ≈ 41.5 g·mm/kg
Total permissible unbalance = 41.5 × 80 = 3,320 g·mm
At correction radius 250 mm: max residual mass = 3320 / 250 = 13.3 g total residual mass
For a two-plane job, distribute that total tolerance between planes; a simple equal split gives about 6.6 g per plane.

Related standards: ISO 21940‑11 (rigid rotors), ISO 21940‑12 (flexible rotors), ISO 10816‑3 (vibration severity limits), ISO 1940 (legacy predecessor).

Seven‑Step Field Balancing Procedure

This is the influence coefficient method for two‑plane field balancing, applied with a portable instrument such as the Balanset‑1A. The same logic works with any two‑channel balancing analyser.

1
Prepare the Rotor & Mount Sensors
Clean bearing housings from dirt and grease — sensors must sit flush on the metal surface. Mount vibration sensor 1 on the bearing housing closest to Plane 1 (usually the drive end). Mount sensor 2 near Plane 2 (non‑drive end). Attach reflective tape to the shaft for the laser tachometer. Connect all cables to the measuring unit.
2
Measure Initial Vibration (Run 0)
Start the rotor and bring it to stable operating speed. The instrument measures vibration amplitude (mm/s) and phase angle (°) at both sensors simultaneously. This is the valor de referencia — the "sickness" of the rotor before treatment. Record the values and stop the machine.
Field tip: Wait at least 10–15 seconds after the RPM stabilises before recording. Thermal transients and air currents settle out in the first few seconds.
Initial vibration measurement on a rotor — Balanset-1A screen showing baseline readings
3
Install Trial Weight in Plane 1 (Run 1)
Stop the rotor. Attach a peso de prueba of known mass at an arbitrary angular position in Plane 1. Mark this position clearly — it becomes your 0° reference for angle measurement later. Restart the rotor and record vibration at both sensors. The instrument now knows how the rotor's vibration field changes when mass is added in Plane 1.
Field tip: Use a bolt with a washer clamped to the rotor rim, or a hose clamp with a nut for quick attachment. The trial weight should produce a measurable vibration change (≥30 % amplitude change or ≥30° phase shift at either sensor).
How much should the trial weight weigh? Use the empirical formula: Mt = Mr × K / (Rt × (N/100)²) where Mr = rotor mass (g), K = support stiffness coefficient (1–5, use 3 for average), Rt = installation radius (cm), N = RPM. Or use our online trial weight calculator — enter your rotor parameters and get the recommended mass instantly.
Installing a calibration weight on the first correction plane
4
Move Trial Weight to Plane 2 (Run 2)
Stop the rotor. Remove the trial weight from Plane 1. Attach the same trial weight (or one of similar known mass) at an arbitrary position in Plane 2. Mark this second reference point. Restart and record vibration at both sensors. Now the instrument has the complete influence coefficient matrix — four complex coefficients linking unbalance in either plane to vibration at either sensor.
Field tip: If you use a different trial weight mass in Plane 2, enter the correct value in the software — the maths adjusts automatically.
Moving the trial weight to the second correction plane for the second trial run
5
Calculate Correction Weights
The instrument solves the influence coefficient equations and displays: mass (g) y angle (°) for Plane 1, and mass (g) and angle (°) for Plane 2. The angle is measured from the trial weight position in the direction of rotor rotation. If the software indicates "remove," it means the correction weight should go 180° opposite the indicated "add" position.
6
Install Correction Weights
Remove the trial weight from Plane 2. Fabricate or select correction weights matching the calculated masses. Measure the angle from the trial weight reference mark in the direction of rotation. Attach the correction weights firmly — welding, hose clamps, set‑screw weights, or bolts depending on the machine type and speed.
Field tip: If you cannot place a weight at the exact angle (e.g. only bolt holes available), use the weight‑splitting function — the instrument decomposes the correction vector into two components at the nearest available positions.
Diagram showing correction weight angle measurement — from trial weight position in direction of rotation
7
Verify Balance (Check Run)
Restart the rotor and record the final vibration. Compare against the initial baseline and against the ISO 21940‑11 tolerance for your machine class. If vibration is within specification, you are done. If not, the instrument can perform a ejecución de ajuste — it uses the existing influence coefficients to calculate a small additional correction without new trial weights.
Field tip: One trim run is usually enough. If you need more than two trims, something has changed between runs — check for loose weights, thermal growth, or speed variation.
Final verification run showing significantly reduced vibration levels after balancing
Los siete pasos — Un solo instrumento
The Balanset‑1A walks you through the entire two‑plane procedure on screen. Two accelerometers, laser tachometer, Windows software, and carrying case included.
€1,975
Ver Balanset-1A WhatsApp

Trial Weight Calculation

The trial weight must be heavy enough to produce a noticeable vibration change, but light enough not to overload bearings or create a dangerous condition. The standard empirical formula accounts for rotor mass, correction radius, operating speed, and support stiffness:

Trial weight mass formula
Mt = Mr × K / (Rt × (N / 100)²)
Mt — trial weight mass, grams
Mr — rotor mass, grams
K — support stiffness coefficient (1 = soft mounts, 3 = average, 5 = rigid foundation)
Rt — trial weight installation radius, cm
N — operating speed, RPM

Don't want to do the maths by hand? Use our online trial weight calculator ↗ — enter your rotor parameters, support type, and vibration level, and get the recommended mass instantly.

Worked Examples (K = 3, average stiffness)

Máquina Masa del rotor RPM Radio Trial weight (K = 3)
Rotor de moldeadora 120 kg 2,200 30 cm 360,000 / (30 × 484) ≈ 25 g
Ventilador industrial 80 kg 1,450 40 cm 240,000 / (40 × 210.25) ≈ 29 g
Centrifuge drum 45 kg 3,000 15 cm 135,000 / (15 × 900) = 10 g
Crusher shaft 250 kg 900 25 cm 750,000 / (25 × 81) ≈ 370 g
Practical tip: verify the response
The formula gives the minimum trial mass that should produce a measurable response. After the trial run, check that the phase shifted by at least 20–30° and the amplitude changed by 20–30%. If the response is too small, double or triple the trial mass and repeat. At very low RPM (< 500), the formula may yield impractically large values — in that case, use 10% of rotor weight divided by the correction radius as a starting point.

Medición del ángulo de corrección

The balancing instrument outputs two numbers per plane: masa (how much weight) and ángulo (where to place it). The angle is always referenced to the trial weight position.

Balanset-1A software — two-plane balancing result window showing correction weight mass and angle on polar diagram
Balanset‑1A result screen: the software calculates correction mass and angle for each plane and displays vectors on a polar chart. Red vectors show the required correction; green shows residual vibration after trim run.

How to Measure the Angle

Polar graph showing correction weight angle relative to trial weight position
  • Reference point (0°): the angular position where you placed the trial weight. Mark it clearly on the rotor before the trial run.
  • Measurement direction: always in the direction of rotor rotation.
  • Reading the angle: the instrument displays angle f₁ for Plane 1 and f₂ for Plane 2. From the trial weight mark, count that many degrees in the rotation direction — that is where the correction weight goes.
  • If removing mass: place the correction at 180° opposite the indicated "add" position.

Weight Splitting to Fixed Positions

Polar graph showing weight split into two fixed bolt-hole positions

When the rotor has pre‑drilled holes or fixed mounting positions (e.g. fan blade bolts), you may not be able to place a weight at the exact calculated angle. The Balanset‑1A includes a weight splitting function: you enter the angles of the two nearest available positions, and the software decomposes the single correction vector into two smaller weights at those positions. The combined effect matches the original vector.

Correction Planes & Sensor Placement

Diagram showing correction planes and sensor measurement points on a rotor

El plano de corrección es la posición axial en el rotor donde se agrega o retira masa. El sensor mide la vibración en el rodamiento más cercano. Algunas reglas clave:

  • El sensor se coloca en el soporte del rodamiento — lo más cerca posible de la línea central del rodamiento, en dirección radial (horizontal preferible).
  • El plano 1 corresponde al sensor 1, el plano 2 al sensor 2. Mantenga la numeración consistente o el software intercambiará los planos de corrección.
  • Maximise plane separation: the further apart the two correction planes, the better the couple resolution. Minimum practical separation is ⅓ of the bearing span.
  • Elija posiciones accesibles: el plano de corrección debe ser una ubicación donde pueda fijar físicamente los pesos: el borde de una brida, un círculo de pernos, un aro o una superficie de soldadura.
Mulcher rotor showing correction planes (blue 1 and 2) and weight installation points (red 1 and 2)

En la foto anterior, un rotor de mulcher está preparado para balanceo en dos planos. Las marcas azules 1 y 2 indican las posiciones de los sensores en los soportes de los rodamientos. Las marcas rojas 1 y 2 muestran los planos de corrección: en este caso, los extremos con brida del cuerpo del rotor donde se soldarán los pesos.

Rotor en voladizo (sobresaliente)

Los rotores en voladizo: impulsores de ventiladores, volantes montados fuera del tramo de rodamientos, impulsores de bombas, requieren un diseño diferente de sensores y planos. Ambos planos de corrección están del mismo lado de los rodamientos, y la colocación de los sensores debe tener en cuenta que la masa en voladizo amplifica el desbalance de par.

Schematic diagram of sensor connection and correction plane layout for a cantilever (overhung) rotor — Balanset-1A two-plane setup
Diagrama de conexión de sensores para un rotor en voladizo: ambos planos de corrección están fuera del tramo de rodamientos.
Cantilever rotor balancing in the field — sensor and correction plane positions marked on actual equipment
Ejemplo en campo: rotor en voladizo con posiciones de sensores y planos de corrección marcadas.

Aplicaciones por tipo de máquina

Industrial Fans & Blowers
600–3,600 RPM · G 6.3 · Two‑plane
Most common field balancing task. Centrifugal fans, axial fans, blowers. Watch for dust buildup on blades — it shifts balance over time. Re‑balance after cleaning or blade replacement.
Mulcher & Flail Mower Rotors
1,800–2,500 RPM · G 16 · Two‑plane
Heavy rotors (80–200 kg) with replaceable flails. Unbalance appears after flail wear or replacement. Correct in two planes at the rotor end‑flanges. Typical improvement: 12 → 1 mm/s.
Crushers & Hammer Mills
600–1,200 RPM · G 16 · Two‑plane
Extremely heavy rotors (200–1,000+ kg). Trial weights are large (5–15 kg bolts). Low RPM means large permissible unbalance — but impact loads and bearing cost still justify balancing.
Centrifugadoras
1,000–10,000 RPM · G 2.5–6.3 · Two‑plane
Basket or disc centrifuges in food, chemical, and pharma. High speed demands tight tolerance. Field balancing avoids lengthy disassembly. Check for product buildup inside drum.
Electric Motors & Generators
750–3,600 RPM · G 2.5 · Two‑plane
Motor armatures are factory balanced, but re‑balancing is needed after winding repair, bearing replacement, or coupling changes. Test with coupling half attached for best results.
Combine Harvester Augers & Rotors
400–1,200 RPM · G 16 · Two‑plane
Long augers and threshing rotors pick up soil and crop residue imbalance. Seasonal balancing before harvest prevents bearing failure in the field. Correction weights welded to flights.
Pump Impellers
1,450–3,600 RPM · G 6.3 · Single or Two‑plane
Overhung impellers often need only single‑plane correction if narrow. For multi‑stage pumps, each impeller is balanced individually on a mandrel before assembly.
Turboalimentadores
30,000–300,000 RPM · G 1.0 · Two‑plane
Ultra‑high speed demands G 1.0 or tighter tolerance. Material removal by grinding — no welded weights at these speeds. Requires high‑frequency vibration sensors.

Métodos de fijación de pesos

Método Attachment Ideal para Límites
Welding Steel washers or plates tack‑welded to rotor rim Mulchers, crushers, heavy industrial rotors Permanent. Cannot use on aluminium or stainless without special rod
Bolts & nuts Bolts through pre‑drilled holes with locknuts Fan impellers, flywheels, coupling flanges Requires existing holes or new drilling
Hose clamps Stainless‑steel hose clamp with weight sandwiched Shafts, rollers, cylindrical rotors in the field Temporary or semi‑permanent. Verify clamp torque
Set‑screw clip‑on Pre‑made clip‑on weights (like tyre weights) Fan blades, thin rims, light rotors Limited mass range. May slip at high RPM
Adhesive (epoxy) Weight glued to surface Precision rotors, clean environments Requires clean dry surface. Temperature limit ~120°C
Retiro de material Drilling or grinding material away from heavy side Turbochargers, high‑speed spindles, impellers Permanent and precise but irreversible. Use when adding weight is not safe

Errores comunes en el balanceo en campo

# Error Consequence Fix
1 Sensor mounted on a guard or cover Resonance of the cover distorts amplitude and phase readings → wrong correction Always mount on the bearing housing metal surface
2 Peso de prueba demasiado ligero Phase and amplitude change is within noise → influence coefficients are unreliable Ensure 20-30% amplitude change or 20-30 degrees of phase shift at least one sensor
3 Speed variation between runs Vibration at 1× changes with RPM² — even 5% speed change corrupts the data Use a tachometer for precise RPM tracking. Wait for speed to stabilise
4 Forgetting to remove the trial weight Correction calculation includes trial weight effect → result is meaningless Follow a strict routine: remove trial weight before installing correction weights
5 Mixing up Plane 1 and Plane 2 Correction weights go in the wrong planes → vibration increases Label sensors and planes clearly. Sensor 1 → Plane 1, Sensor 2 → Plane 2
6 Measuring angle opposite to rotation Correction goes 360° − f instead of f → opposite side of rotor Confirm rotation direction before starting. Always measure in rotation direction
7 Thermal growth during runs Bearing clearance changes between cold start runs → drifting measurements Either warm up to steady state before run 0, or complete all runs quickly (<5 min apart)
8 Using single‑plane on a long rotor Couple unbalance remains uncorrected → vibration may even increase at the far bearing Use two-plane balancing for any rotor where L/D >= 0.5, plane separation is significant, or single-plane correction affects the far bearing

Field Report: Mulcher Rotor Balancing

Real field data · February 2025
Flail Mulcher — Maschio Bisonte 280
Vibration before
12.4 mm/s
Vibration after
0.8 mm/s
Reduction
93.5%
Time on site
38 min

Máquina: Maschio Bisonte 280 flail mulcher, 165 kg rotor, 2,100 RPM PTO speed. Client reported severe vibration after replacing 8 flails.

Configuración: Two accelerometers on bearing housings, laser tachometer on PTO shaft. Balanset-1A two-plane mode.

Run 0: Sensor 1 = 12.4 mm/s @ 47°, Sensor 2 = 8.9 mm/s @ 213°. ISO 10816-3 zone D (danger).

Trial runs: 500 g trial weight used in both planes. Clear response — amplitude change >60% at both sensors.

Corrección: Plane 1: 340 g welded at 128°. Plane 2: 215 g welded at 276°.

Verificación: Sensor 1 = 0.8 mm/s, Sensor 2 = 0.6 mm/s. ISO zone A (good). No trim run needed.

Two‑Plane Dynamic Balancing of a Fan

Industrial fans — centrifugal, axial, and mixed‑flow — are among the most common rotors balanced in the field. The procedure below walks through a real two‑plane job on a radial fan using the Balanset‑1A.

Determinación de planos e instalación de sensores

Clean the surfaces for sensor installation from dirt and oil. Sensors must fit snugly to the metal surface of the bearing housing — never mount on covers, guards, or unsupported sheet‑metal panels.

Sensor connection diagram for fan two-plane balancing — Balanset-1A setup with correction planes marked
Sensor connection and correction plane layout for a cantilever‑mounted fan impeller.
Fan rotor with sensor positions and correction planes marked in red and green zones
Sensor and correction plane positions on a fan rotor: Sensor 1 (red) near front, Sensor 2 (green) near rear.
  • Sensor 1 (red): Install closer to the front of the fan (Plane 1 side).
  • Sensor 2 (green): Install closer to the rear of the fan (Plane 2 side).
  • Plane 1 (red zone): Correction plane on the impeller disc, closer to the front.
  • Plane 2 (green zone): Correction plane closer to the back plate or hub.

Connect both vibration sensors and the laser tachometer to the Balanset‑1A. Attach reflective tape to the shaft or hub for RPM reference.

Proceso de balanceo

Start the fan and take initial vibration measurements (Run 0). Install a trial weight of known mass on Plane 1 at an arbitrary point, run the fan, and record the vibration change (Run 1). Move the trial weight to Plane 2 at an arbitrary point, run the fan again, and record (Run 2). The Balanset‑1A software uses all three measurements to calculate the correction mass and angle for each plane.

Installing correction weights on a fan impeller after two-plane balancing with Balanset-1A
Correction weights installed on the fan impeller at positions calculated by the Balanset‑1A.

Angle Measurement for Fan Correction Weights

The angle is measured from the trial weight position in the direction of fan rotation — exactly as described in the Medición del ángulo de corrección section above. Mark where the trial weight was placed (0° reference), then count the indicated angle along the rotation direction to find the correction weight position.

Balanset-1A software screen showing two-plane balancing results for a fan — polar diagram with correction vectors
Balanset‑1A two‑plane balancing result screen: correction mass and angle displayed for both planes.

Based on the angles and masses calculated by the software, install the correction weights on Plane 1 and Plane 2. Run the fan once more and verify that vibration has dropped to an acceptable level per ISO 21940‑11 (typically G 6.3 for general‑purpose fans). If residual vibration is still above target, perform one trim run.

Preguntas frecuentes

Static balancing corrects unbalance in a single plane — the rotor's centre of gravity is shifted back to the rotation axis. It works for narrow, disc-shaped parts where diameter is greater than 7 times the width. Dynamic balancing corrects unbalance in two planes simultaneously, addressing both force and couple unbalance. It is required for any elongated rotor where masses are distributed along the shaft length. A rotor can be statically balanced yet dynamically unbalanced — the couple component is invisible until the rotor spins.
Use the formula: Mt = Mr × K / (Rt × (N/100)²), where M is in grams, R in cm, and N in RPM. K is the support stiffness coefficient (1 = soft, 3 = average, 5 = rigid). The goal is to produce at least 20–30% amplitude change or 20–30° phase shift. Or skip the maths and use our online trial weight calculator. At low speeds below 500 RPM, use the 10% static rule instead: trial mass = 10% of rotor mass / correction radius.
Use single-plane for narrow disc-shaped rotors where diameter exceeds 7 times the axial width — flywheels, grinding wheels, saw blades. Use two-plane for anything longer: shafts, fan impellers, mulcher rotors, rollers, multi-stage pump assemblies. When in doubt, always choose two-plane — it catches couple unbalance that single-plane misses, and only adds one extra measurement run (about 10 minutes).
ISO 21940-11:2016 is the current standard for rigid rotors. It replaced ISO 1940-1:2003. It defines balance quality grades from G 0.4 (gyroscopes) to G 4000 (slow marine diesel crankshafts). Common grades: G 6.3 for fans and pumps, G 2.5 for electric motors, G 1.0 for turbocharger rotors, G 16 for agricultural machinery and crushers. The grade times the angular velocity gives the maximum permissible CG velocity in mm/s — from there you calculate the allowable residual mass at the correction radius.
The instrument calculates the correction angle relative to the trial weight position. Mark where you placed the trial weight — this is your 0° reference. Then measure the indicated angle in the direction of rotor rotation from that reference point. The correction weight goes at the resulting position. If the instrument says to remove weight, place it 180° opposite. Use a protractor or divide the circumference into marked segments before starting.
Yes — this is called field balancing or in-situ balancing. You mount vibration sensors on the bearing housings, attach a tachometer reference, and run the machine at operating speed. A portable instrument like the Balanset-1A guides you through the trial weight sequence and calculates corrections. Field balancing saves hours of disassembly time, eliminates alignment errors from reinstallation, and balances the rotor under real operating conditions — including the effect of coupling, thermal growth, and actual bearing stiffness.

Equipo para balanceo en campo

El Balanset‑1A is a two‑channel portable instrument that handles single‑plane and two‑plane dynamic balancing, plus vibration analysis (overall velocity, spectra, waveform). It ships as a complete kit:

  • 2x MEMS vibration sensors (ADXL335-based accelerometers) with magnetic mounts
  • Laser tachometer (non‑contact RPM sensor) with reflective tape
  • USB measuring unit (connects to any Windows laptop)
  • Software: balancing wizard, vibration meter, spectrum analyser
  • Carrying case with all cables and accessories

RPM range: 250-90,000. Vibration range: 0.2-80 mm/s RMS. Frequency range: 5-1000 Hz. Phase accuracy: ?1?. Weight splitting, trim runs, tolerance checking, and report generation included in the software. Full kit weighs approximately 4 kg.

Balanset‑1A — Portable Balancer & Vibration Analyser
Two channels. Two planes. One instrument for field balancing, vibration measurement, and ISO tolerance verification.
€1,975
Ordenar ahora Ask via WhatsApp
Balanset-1A portable balancer and vibration analyzer — complete kit with sensors, tachometer, and carrying case
NS
Nikolai Shelkovenko
CEO & Field Engineer · Vibromera
13+ years in vibration diagnostics and field balancing. Personally balanced 2,000+ rotors across mulchers, fans, crushers, centrifuges, and combine harvesters in 20+ countries.
WhatsApp
Balanset-1A · €1975Ask engineer